Comment on "A glance beyond the quantum model" [arXiv:0907.0372]
Jan, 2010Citations per year
Abstract: (arXiv)
The aim of "A glance beyond the quantum model" [arXiv:0907.0372] to modernize the Correspondence Principle is compromised by an assumption that a classical model must start with the idea of particles, whereas in empirical terms particles are secondary to events. The discussion also proposes, contradictorily, that observers who wish to model the macroscopic world classically should do so in terms of classical fields, whereas, if we are to use fields, it would more appropriate to adopt the mathematics of random fields. Finally, the formalism used for discussion of Bell inequalities introduces two assumptions that are not necessary for a random field model, locality of initial conditions and non-contextuality, even though these assumptions are, in contrast, very natural for a classical particle model. Whether we discuss physics in terms of particles or in terms of events and (random) fields leads to differences that a glance would be well to notice.Note:
- "A glance beyond the quantum model" appeared as ProcRoySocA 2010 466, 881-890, DOI:10.1098/rspa.2009.0453. This "comment" (written as MSWord, 4 pages, converted to PDF) submitted to ProcRoySocA 1/27/2010
- particle: model
- particle: classical
- quantum mechanics: model
- random field
- Bell inequality
- transition: thermodynamical
- statistics
References(22)
Figures(0)