literature
Literature
Authors
Jobs
Seminars
Conferences
DataBETA

In defence of non-ontic accounts of quantum states

Apr, 2012
32 pages
Published in:
  • Stud.Hist.Phil.Sci.B 44 (2013) 77-92
e-Print:
DOI:
View in:
pdf
reference search1 citation

Citations per year

20172018201901
Abstract: (Elsevier)
The paper discusses objections against non-hidden variable versions of the epistemic conception of quantum states-the view that quantum states do not describe the properties of quantum systems but reflect, in some way to be specified, the epistemic conditions of agents assigning them. In the first half of the paper, the main motivation for the epistemic conception of quantum states is sketched, and a version of it is outlined, which combines ideas from an earlier study of it (Friederich, 2011) with elements of Richard Healey's recent pragmatist interpretation of quantum theory (Healey, 2012). In the second half, various objections against epistemic accounts of quantum states are discussed in detail, which are based on criticisms found in the literature. Possible answers by the version outlined here are compared with answers from the quantum Bayesian point of view, which is at present the most discussed version of the epistemic conception of quantum states.
Note:
  • 35 pages, forthcoming in "Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics"
  • Quantum states
  • Quantum probabilities
  • Anthropocentric notions
  • Micro/macro divide
  • Explanation and prediction
  • [Appleby, 2005]

    Facts, values and quanta

    • D.M. Appleby
      • Found.Phys. 35 (2005) 627
  • [Barnum, 2010]
    Quantum knowledge, quantum belief, quantum reality: Notes of a QBist fellow traveler
    • H.N. Barnum
  • [Bell, 1990a]

    Against ‘measurement’

    • J.S. Bell
  • [Bell, 1990b]

    La nouvelle cuisine

    • A. Sarlemijn
      ,
    • P. Kroes
      ,
    • J.S. Bell
  • [Butterfield, 1992]

    David lewis meets John Bell

    • J. Butterfield
      • Phil.Sci. 59 (1992) 26
  • [Caves et al, 2002a]

    Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities

    • C.M. Caves
      ,
    • C.A. Fuchs
      ,
    • R. Schack
      • Phys.Rev.A 65 (2002) 022305
  • [Caves et al, 2002b]

    Unknown quantum states: The quantum de Finetti representation

    • C.M. Caves
      ,
    • C.A. Fuchs
      ,
    • R. Schack
      • J.Math.Phys. 44 (2002) 4537
  • [Caves et al, 2007]

    Subjective probability and quantum certainty

    • C.M. Caves
      ,
    • C.A. Fuchs
      ,
    • R. Schack
      • Stud.Hist.Phil.Sci.B 38 (2007) 255
  • [Duwell, 2011]

    Uncomfortable bedfellows: Objective quantum Bayesianism and the von Neumann–Lüders projection postulate

    • A. Duwell
      • Stud.Hist.Phil.Sci.B 42 (2011) 167
  • [Fleming, 1989]
    (1989). Lorentz invariant state reduction and localization. In A. Fine, & M. Forbes (eds.) PSA(Vol. 2). Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI
    • G.N. Fleming
  • [Friederich, 2011]

    How to spell out the epistemic conception of quantum states

    • S. Friederich
      • Stud.Hist.Phil.Sci.B 42 (2011) 149
  • [Fuchs, 2010]
    QBism, the perimeter of quantum Bayesianism
    • C.A. Fuchs
  • [Fuchs, 2009]
    Quantum-Bayesian coherence
    • C.A. Fuchs
      ,
    • R. Schack
  • [Fuchs and Schack, 2011]

    A quantum–Bayesian route to quantum-state space

    • C.A. Fuchs
      ,
    • R. Schack
      • Found.Phys. 41 (2011) 345
  • [Healey, 2012]

    Quantum theory: A pragmatist approach

    • R. Healey
  • [Healey, in press-a]
    How quantum theory helps us explain, 〈 〉, in press-a
    • R. Healey
  • [Healey, in press-b]

    non-local

    • R. Healey
  • [Heisenberg, 1958]
    Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. George Allen & Unwin, London [repr. 2007 by Harper, New York, page numbers referring to this edition]
    • W. Heisenberg
  • [Jaynes, 1957]

    Information theory and statistical mechanics

    • E.T. Jaynes
      • The Physical Review 106 (1957) 620
  • [Jordan, 1934]

    Quantenphysikalische Bemerkungen zur Biologie und Psychologie

    • P. Jordan
      • Erkenntnis 4 (1934) 215
  • [Lewis, 1986]
    Causal explanation. In Philosophical papers, (Vol. II, pp. 214-240). New York: Oxford University Press
    • D. Lewis
  • [Lewis, 1994]

    Humean supervenience debugged

    • D. Lewis
      • Mind 103 (1994) 473
  • [Marchildon, 2004]

    Why should we interpret quantum mechanics?

    • L. Marchildon
      • Found.Phys. 34 (2004) 1453
  • [Maudlin, 1995]

    Three measurement problems

    • T. Maudlin
      • Topoi 14 (1995) 7
  • 1-25 of 44
  • 1
  • 2
  • 25 / page