Citations per year
0 Citations
Abstract: (arXiv)
In physics we encounter particles in one of two ways. Either as fundamental constituents of the theory or as emergent excitations. These two ways differ by how the particle relates to the background. It either sits on the background, or it is an excitation of the background. We argue that by choosing the former to construct our fundamental theories we have made a costly mistake. Instead we should think of particles as excitations of a background. We show that this point of view sheds new light on the cosmological constant problem and even leads to observable consequences by giving a natural explanation for the appearance of MOND-like behavior. In this context it also becomes clear why there are numerical coincidences between the MOND acceleration parameter, the cosmological constant and the Hubble parameter.Note:
- This article received a forth prize in the 2012 FQXi essay contest 'Questioning the Foundations'. More articles from this contest can be found on the FQXi website at fqxi.org
- background
- excited state
- cosmological constant
- Hubble constant
- expansion: acceleration
- MOND
- numerical calculations
References(0)
Figures(0)
Loading ...