Cross-calibration of Suzaku XIS and XMM-Newton EPIC using clusters of galaxies

We extend a previous cross-calibration study by the International Astronomical Consortium for High Energy Calibration (IACHEC) on XMM-Newton/EPIC, Chandra/ACIS and BeppoSAX/MECS X-ray instruments with clusters of galaxies to Suzaku/XIS instruments. Our aim is to study the accuracy of the energy-dependent effective area calibration of the XIS instruments by comparison of spectroscopic temperatures, fluxes and fit residuals obtained with Suzaku/XIS and XMM-Newton/EPIC-pn for the same cluster. The temperatures measured in the hard 2.0-7.0 keV energy band with all instruments are consistent within 5 %. However, temperatures obtained with the XIS instruments in the soft 0.5-2.0 keV band disagree by 9-29 %. We investigated residuals in the XIS soft band, which showed that if XIS0 effective area shape is accurately calibrated, the effective areas of XIS1 and XIS3 are overestimated below 1.0 keV (or vice versa). Adjustments to the modelling of the column density of the XIS contaminant in the 3-6 arcmin extraction region while forcing consistent emission models in each instrument for a given cluster significantly improved the fits. The oxygen column density in XIS1 and XIS3 contaminant must be increased by 1-2E17 cm^-2 in comparison to the values implemented in the current calibration, while the column density of the XIS0 contaminant given by the analysis is consistent with the public calibration. XIS soft band temperatures obtained with the modification to the column density of the contaminant agree better with temperatures obtained with the EPIC-pn instrument of XMM-Newton, than with those derived using the Chandra-ACIS instrument. However, comparison of hard band fluxes obtained using Suzaku-XIS to fluxes obtained using the Chandra-ACIS and EPIC-pn instruments proved inconclusive.

Note:

24 pages, 27 figures, accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics

References(239)

Figures(28)

Fig. 1. XIS1 raw count rate maps (not corrected for the background or vignetting) of the soft band cluster sample in a 0.5 - 7.0 keV

energy band binned to 8 pixels (∼ 0.14 arcmin) per bin. The inner and outer radii of the 3 - 6 arcmin extraction region are denoted

by white circles, the green circles show the excluded regions centred on point sources seen in XMM-Newton EPIC / pn images

Scaling of the maps are adjusted for plot clarity and do not reflect the relative brightness of the clusters. The colour bar shows the

the total number of counts per bin

5.3. Suzaku non X-ray background

We used the xisnxbgen tool with default settings to generate

spectra of the Suzaku XIS non X-ray background (NXB) based

on night Earth observations. We used COR2 weighting for NXB

construction and to verify the normalisation of the NXB gener-

ated using the xisnxbgen tool, we compared the > 10 keV NXB

flux with that in the cluster data and found them consistent. We

subsequently subtracted the NXB spectra from the cluster spec-

tra in all Suzaku XIS spectral fits by using the NXB spectra as

background files in Xspec and thus considered the uncertainty of

the NXB in the spectral fits

Fig. 2. The total emission (blue crosses), sky background (black

curve) and non X-ray background (red crosses) emission of

A496 in the 3 - 6 arcmin region for XIS1. The sky back-

ground is modelled from ROSAT All Sky Survey data and folded

through the XIS1 response. The XIS1 observation of A496 has

the strongest relative background emission of the cluster sample

5.4. Charge exchange contamination

Geocoronal and heliospheric Solar wind charge exchange

(SWCX) 2004

Wargelin

1-25 of 239
1
2
3
4
5
•••
10
25 / page