literature
Literature
Authors
Jobs
Seminars
Conferences
DataBETA

Magnetic field decay of magnetars in supernova remnants

2012
41 pages
Published in:
  • Astrophys.Space Sci. 342 (2012) 55
e-Print:
DOI:
View in:
pdf
reference search13 citations

Citations per year

201320162019202220242013
Abstract: (arXiv)
In this paper, we modify our previous research carefully, and derive a new expression of electron energy density in superhigh magnetic fields. Based on our improved model, we re-compute the electron capture rates and the magnetic fields' evolutionary timescales tt of magnetars. According to the calculated results, the superhigh magnetic fields may evolve on timescales ∼(106−107)\sim (10^{6}-10^{7}) yrs for common magnetars, and the maximum timescale of the field decay, t≈2.9507×106t\approx 2.9507 \times 10^{6} yrs, corresponding to an initial internal magnetic field B0=3.0×1015B_{\rm 0}= 3.0 \times 10^ {15} G and an initial inner temperature T0=2.6×108T_{\rm 0}= 2.6 \times 10^ {8} K. Motivated by the results of the neutron star-supernova remnant(SNR) association of Zhang &\& Xie(2011), we calculate the maximum B0B_{\rm 0} of magnetar progenitors, Bmax∼(2.0×1014−2.93×1015)B_{\rm max}\sim (2.0\times 10^{14}-2.93 \times 10^{15}) G when T0=2.6×108T_{\rm 0}= 2.6 \times 10^ {8} K. When T0∼2.75×108− 1.75×108T_{\rm 0}\sim 2.75 \times 10^ {8}-~1.75 \times 10^ {8} K, the maximum B0B_{\rm 0} will also be in the range of ∼1014−1015\sim 10^{14}-10^{15} G, not exceeding the upper limit of magnetic field of a magnetar under our magnetar model. We also investigate the relationship between the spin-down ages of magnetars and the ages of their SNRs, and explain why all AXPs associated with SNRs look older than their real ages, whereas all SGRs associated with SNRs appear younger than they are.
Note:
  • 17 Pages, 8 Figures, Published in Astrophys. Space. Sci. 2012. 342, 55-71
  • 1-25 of 106
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 25 / page