A dedicated high resolution PET imager for plant sciences

PET provides in vivo molecular and functional imaging capability that is crucial to studying the interaction of plant with changing environment at the whole-plant level. We have developed a dedicated plant PET imager that features high spatial resolution, housed in a fully controlled environment provided by a plant growth chamber (PGC). The system currently contains two types of detector modules: 84 microPET R4 block detectors with 2.2 mm crystals to provide a large detecting area; and 32 Inveon block detectors with 1.5 mm crystals to provide higher spatial resolution. Outputs of the four microPET block detectors in a modular housing are concatenated by a custom printed circuit board to match the output characteristics of an Inveon detector. All the detectors are read out by QuickSilver electronics. The detector modules are configured to full rings with a 15 cm diameter trans-axial field of view (FOV) for dynamic tomographic imaging of small plants. Potentially, the Inveon detectors can be reconfigured to quarter-rings to get a 25 cm FOV using step-and-shoot motion. The imager contains 2 linear stages to position detectors at different heights for multi-bed scanning, and 2 rotation stages to collect coincidence events from all angles. The PET system has been built and integrated into the PGC. The system has a typical energy resolution of 15% for Inveon blocks and 24% for R4 blocks; timing resolution of 1.8 ns; and sensitivity of 1.3%,1.4%,3.0% measured at center of FOV, 5 cm off to R4 half-ring and 5 cm off to Inveon half-ring, respectively(with a 350-650 KeV energy and 3.1 ns timing window). System spatial resolution is similar to that of commercial microPET sytems, with 1.25 mm rod sources in the micro-Derenzo phantom resolved using ML-EM algorithm. Preliminary imaging experiments using different plants labeled with 11C-CO2 produced high-quality dynamic PET images.

Note:

19 pages

References(25)

Figures(15)

[1]

Wanneng Yang, Lingfeng Duan, Guoxing Chen, Lizhong Xiong, and Qian Liu. Plant phenomics and high-throughput phenotyping: accelerating rice functional genomics using multidisciplinary technologies. Current opinion in plant biology, 16(2):180-7, May 2013

[2]

Developing X-ray Computed Tomography to non-invasively image 3-D root systems architecture in soil. Plant and Soil, 352(1-2):1-22, November 2011

S.J. Mooney
,
T.P. Pridmore
,
J. Helliwell
,
M.J. Bennett

[3]

Ljudmilla Borisjuk, Hardy Rolletschek, and Thomas Neuberger. Surveying the plant’s world by magnetic resonance imaging. The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 70(1):129-46, April 2012

[4]

Fabio Fiorani, Uwe Rascher, Siegfried Jahnke, and Ulrich Schurr. Imaging plants dynamics in heterogenic environments. Current opinion in biotechnology, 23(2):227-35, April 2012

[5]

Stijn Dhondt, Nathalie Wuyts, and Dirk Inzé. Cell to whole-plant phenotyping: the best is yet to come. Trends in plant

- Science 18 (2013) 428-39

[6]

Positron emission tomography provides molecular imaging of biological processes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(16):9226- 33, August 2000

M.E. Phelps

[7]

Use of positron emission tomography in animal research. ILAR journal / National Research Council, Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, 42(3):219-32, January 2001

S.R. Cherry
,
S.S. Gambhir

[8]

Using the short-lived isotope 11C in mechanistic studies of photosynthate transport. Functional Plant Biology, 30(8):831, 2003

Peter E.H. Minchin
,
Michael R. Thorpe

[9]

Exploring the transport of plant metabolites using positron emitting radiotracers. HFSP journal, 2(4):189-204, August 2008

Matthew R. Kiser
,
Chantal D. Reid
,
Alexander S. Crowell
,
Richard P. Phillips
,
Calvin R. Howell

[10]

Amin Garbout and Radoslaw Pajor. The use of PET/CT scanning technique for 3D visualization and quantification of real-time soil/plant interactions. Plant and Soil, 352(1-2):113-127, September 2011

Lars J. Munkholm
,
Søren B. Hansen
,
Bjørn M. Petersen
,
Ole L. Munk

[11]

A compact planar positron imaging system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A : Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 516(2-3):564-574, January 2004

H. Uchida
,
T. Okamoto
,
T. Ohmura
,
K. Shimizu
,
N. Satoh

et al.

[12]

a. Fedorovd, U. Heinrichs, M. Korjik, M. Krieguer, C. Kuntner, G. Largeron, C. Lartizien, H. Larue, P. Lecoq, S. Leonard, J Marteau, Ch. Morel, J.B Mosset, Ch. Parl, Ch. Pedrini, a.G. Petrosyan, U. Pietrzyk, M. Rey, S. Saladino, D. Sappey-Marinier, L. Simon, M. Streun, S Tavernier, and J.M. Vieira. The ClearPET project: development of a 2nd generation high-performance small animal PET scanner. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A : Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 537(1-2):307-311, January 2005

K. Ziemons
,
R. Barbier
,
G. Brandenburg
,
P. Bruyndonckx
,
Y. Choi

et al.

[13]

Design and initial performance of PlanTIS: a high-resolution positron emission tomograph for plants

S. Beer
,
M. Streun
,
T. Hombach
,
J. Buehler
,
S. Jahnke

et al.

- Phys.Med.Biol. 55 (2010) 635-46

[14]

Vaska, a Villaneuva, N Volkow, and B Yu. RatCAP: a small, head-mounted PET tomograph for imaging the brain of an awake RAT. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A : Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 527(1-2):166-170, July 2004

C. Woody
,
a. Kriplani
,
P. OConnor
,
J.-F Pratte
,
V. Radeka

et al.

[15]

First results from the BNL plant imaging system. In Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), pages 3530-3532 October 2012

M. Budassi
,
S. Stoll

[16]

Nuclear physics detector technology applied to plant biology research. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A : Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 718:157-159, August 2013

A.G. Weisenberger
,
B. Kross
,
S.J. Lee
,
J. McKisson
,
J.E. McKisson

et al.

[17]

Marine Soret and Irène Buvat. Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 48(6):932-45, June 2007

Stephen L. Bacharach

[18]

Paul Vaska, Srilalan Krishnamoorthy, Richard Ferrieri, Michael Schueller, David J Schlyer, and Joanna S Fowler PET imaging of thin objects: measuring the effects of positron range and partial-volume averaging in the leaf of Nicotiana tabacum. Nuclear medicine and biology, 38(2):191-200, February 2011

David L. Alexoff
,
Stephen L. Dewey

[19]

Heyu Wu and Yuan-Chuan novel phoswich imaging detector for simultaneous beta and coincidence-gamma imaging of plant leaves

Tai. A

- Phys.Med.Biol. 56 (2011) 5583-98

[20]

DF Newport and SB Siegel. QuickSilver: a flexible, extensible, and high-speed architecture for multi-modality imaging. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2006 pages 2333-2334, 2006

[21]

Tae Yong Song, Heyu Wu, Sergey Komarov and Yuan-Chuan Tai. A submillimeter resolution PET detector module using a multi-pixel photon counter array

Stefan B. Siegel

- Phys.Med.Biol. 55 (2010) 2573-87

[22]

Performance evaluation of the microPET P4: a PET system dedicated to animal imaging

Y.C. Tai
,
A. Chatziioannou
,
S. Siegel
,
J. Young
,
D. Newport

et al.

- Phys.Med.Biol. 46 (2001) 1845-1862

[23]

Qinan Bao, Danny Newport, Mu Chen Performance evaluation of the inveon dedicated PET preclinical tomograph based on the NEMA NU-4 standards. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 50(3):401-8, March 2009

David B. Stout
,
Arion F. Chatziioannou

[24]

a. Nassalski, a. Syntfeld-Kauch, T. Szcz´sniak, W. Czarnacki, D. Wolski, G Pausch, and J. Stein. Temperature dependences of LaBr3(Ce), LaCl3(Ce) and NaI(Tl) scintillators. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A : Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 568(2):739-751, December 2006

M. Moszyski

[25]

Comparison of LuYAP, LSO, and BGO as scintillators for high resolution PET detectors

S. Weber
,
D. Christ
,
M. Kurzeja

- IEEE Trans.Nucl.Sci. 50 (2003) 1370-1372