Gen. Relativ. and Gravit. 44, 2989

The original motivation that led to this formulation came from trying to helicalise a given curve [32], i.e. replacing the given curve by another curve which winds around it

Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco,)

As seen in the next section, the spatial 3-manifold representing a non-uniformly rotating universe would itself contain a gvφ spatial cross-term

A useful lower-dimensional analogue for visualisation is to think of embedding a 2-d surface into ordinary 3-d Euclidean space using cylindrical coordinates r, φ and z so that r and φ are the usual plane polar coordinates with z being the third spatial coordinate. The general framework for generating surfaces of revolution by adding circles or 1-spheres to a given curve is described in [2]

Note that in [1], the coordinates u and w were used in place of θ and φ, with the radial function denoted as Z(v) (see Eq. (1)). The reason such general symbols were used was because they were not the usual spherical coordinates as the given curve (which was not necessarily a straight line since curved wormholes were to be constructed) would naturally induce a more general coordinate system. Here, the focus is on manifolds of revolution around a straight line (in fact rotating about that line) so we are indeed working with the three usual spherical coordinates r, θ, φ plus the fourth spatial coordinate z

Like an expanding universe, the spacetime itself is expanding as opposed to the galaxies themselves moving away from each other

Matt Visser provides an excellent description on these various coordinate systems that cover only certain regions of the Schwarzschild geometry, which played a part in leading Einstein and Rosen to deduce the Einstein-Rosen bridge from their coordinates in [33]. The EinsteinRosen coordinates are ds2 = -u2/(u2 +Rs)dt2 +4(u2 +Rs)du2 +(u2 +Rs)2(dθ2 +sin2 θ dφ2). See for instance chapter five in [5]

The logical flow to arrive at this choice of parametrisation would be as follows: In isotropic coordinates, a spacetime metric takes the general form ds2 = gtt(v)dt2 + A(v)(dv2 + v2dθ2 + v2 sin2 θ dφ2). By comparing with our generic form in Eq. (6), we see that z and r has to satisfy z 2 = r2/v2 - r 2. By eliminating z 2 in place of r and r, the vacuum field equation Gtt = 0 reduces to 2v2rr = (r - vr )2, where r(v) = v(1 + Rs/4v)2 is a solution. It then follows that z(v) = (4v - Rs) Rs/4v. Finally gtt(v) can be solved from other components of the vacuum field equations to give gtt(v) = -[(1 - Rs/4v)/(1 + Rs/4v)]2. The metric is hence ds2 = -[(1 - Rs/4v)/(1 + Rs/4v)]2dt2 + (1 + Rs/4v)4(dv2 + v2dθ2 + v2 sin2 θ dφ2), as anticipated. (See chapter 2.3.9 in [5], for instance. Look out for the typo in Eq. (2.42) where (1 + rs/4ρ)2 should be (1 + rs/4ρ)4.)

In [1, 2] where static curved traversable wormholes were constructed, the parametrisations were essentially chosen from the beginning when the curve ψ(v) and the radial function Z(v) were defined

It is obvious that ω = 0 gives Gµν = 0, so that a non-rotating Schwarzschild geometry is Ricci flat

The null energy condition asserts that for any null vector, Tµνkµkν ≥ 0. This can be found in page 115 of [5]

If Rs = 0, then from Eqs. (9) or (10) the metric for a non-uniformly rotating Minkowski spacetime has gtt = -1, which implies no tidal force

Proc. Kon. Ned Akad. Wetensch. B51, 793

The black hole war: My battle with Stephen Hawking to make the world safe for quantum mechanics (Little, Brown,)