Many-Measurements or Many-Worlds? A Dialogue

Jun 3, 2014
19 pages
e-Print:
DOI:

Citations per year

20182019202001
Abstract: (arXiv)
Many advocates of the Everettian interpretation consider that theirs is the only approach to take quantum mechanics really seriously, and that this approach allows to deduce a fantastic scenario for our reality, one that consists of an infinite number of parallel worlds that branch out continuously. In this article, written in dialogue form, we suggest that quantum mechanics can be taken even more seriously, if the 'many-worlds' view is replaced by a 'many-measurements' view. This allows not only to derive the Born rule, thus solving the measurement problem, but also to deduce a one-world 'non-spatial' reality, providing an even more fantastic scenario than that of the multiverse.
Note:
  • 19 pages, 3 figures; to be published in: Found. Sci
  • [2]
    The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton
    • B. DeWitt
      ,
    • N. Graham
  • [3]
    D
  • [4]
    Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitrechnung, Ergebnisse Der Mathematik
    • A.N. Kolmogorov
  • [4]
    translated as Foundations of Probability, New York: Chelsea Publishing Company
    • A.N. Kolmogorov
  • [6]

  • [7]
    Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton
    • J. von Neumann
  • [8]

    Description of many physical entities without the paradoxes encountered in quantum mechanics

    • D. Aerts
      • Found.Phys. 12 (1982) 1131-1170
  • [9]
    Foundations of Quantum Physics, Reading Mass.: W. A
    • C. Piron
  • [10]
    PCT, spin and statistics, and all that, W. A
    • R.F. Streater
      ,
    • A.S. Wightman
  • [11]
    on Probabilities, New York:
    • P.S. Laplace
      ,
    • A. Philosophical Essay
  • [12]

    The unreasonable success of quantum probability I: Quantum measurements as uniform measurements

    • D. Aerts
      ,
    • M. Sassoli de Bianchi
  • [13]

    The unreasonable success of quantum probability II: Quantum measurements as universal measurements

    • D. Aerts
      ,
    • M. Sassoli de Bianchi
  • [14]

    God may not play dice, but human observers surely do

    • M. Sassoli de Bianchi
  • [15]

  • [16]

    A remark on the role of indeterminism and non-locality in the violation of Bell’s inequality

    • M. Sassoli de Bianchi
      • Annals Phys. 342 (2014) 133-142
  • [17]

    A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics

    • D. Aerts
      • J.Math.Phys. 27 (1986) 202-210
  • [18]

    The hidden measurement formalism: what can be explained and where paradoxes remain

    • D. Aerts
      • Int.J.Theor.Phys. 37 (1998) 291
  • [19]

    The entity and modern physics: the creation-discovery view of reality.

    • D. Aerts
  • [20]

    The Stuff the World is Made of: Physics and Reality

    • D. Aerts
    • [20]
      Publishers, Dordrecht, 274 pp
      • D. Aerts
    • [21]

      Using simple elastic bands to explain quantum mechanics: a conceptual review of two of Aerts’ machine-models

      • M. Sassoli de Bianchi
        • Eur.J.Phys. 11 (2013) 147-161
    • [22]

      The Extended Bloch Representation of Quantum Mechanics and the HiddenMeasurement Solution to the Measurement Problem

      • D. Aerts
        ,
      • M. Sassoli de Bianchi
    • [23]

      Quantum Theory of Probability and Decisions

        • Proc.Roy.Soc.Lond.A A 455 (1999) 3129-3137