The components Fµ represent the external body force resultant that is applied to O

The components Mν µ represent the resultant external body force-couple (i.e., torque) that is applied to O

The components a µσ represent the energy-momentum-stress state of O

The components aν µµ represent the angular-momentum-couple-stress state of specific functional forms of the components of φ then embody the mechanical constitutive laws for the medium M4 and the object O. In particular, Fµ might depend upon the point in Minkowski space or the generalized velocity, as in the case of viscosity. If one differentiates the action of J1 (O

ISO(3, 1)) on J1 (O

L0(M4 )) then one will get: dxµ = ξµ + 0x L dxµ ν µ ν ν ν+I, (3.15) deµ ν = 0e L deµ κ µ κ κ ν κ ν+I, (3.16) adxµ = 0 0a a a a ax x L dx L dxµ µ ν µ ν µ ν µ ν ν ν ν νξ + + + +I I, (3.17) adeµ ν = 0 0a a a ae e L de L deµ κ µ κ µ κ µ κ κ ν κ ν κ ν κ ν+ + +I I, (3.18) into which we have introduced the anholonomic coframe field: ξµ

The free Dirac electron. The Weyssenhoff fluid that we shall discuss in the next section is a relativistically-spinning fluid that represents an approximation to the tensorial form of the wave function of the Dirac electron. Thus, we shall first summarize the tensorial form of the Dirac electron in order to motivate the form of the Weyssenhoff fluid and then go on to address that fluid more specifically. As we shall see, the Dirac electron gives a physically-fundamental example of a relativistic Cosserat object. By now, the standard (up to conventions) way of representing the wave function of the free electron/positron is by way of a differentiable function ψ : M4 → C4 and its Hermitian conjugate ψ†, or rather, its Dirac conjugate: ψ = ψ† γ 0. Here, the matrices γµ, µ = 0, 1, 2, 3 represent the generators eµ, µ = 0, 1, 2, 3 of the Clifford algebra C(1, 3) over Minkowski space, and the matrices γµ represent the generators θµ of the Clifford algebra over its dual space. Thus, the matrices are related by: γµ = ηµν γν = ± γµ. Whereas γ 0

The Weyssenhoff fluid. The abstraction that Weyssenhoff [8] made (the contribution of his former student Raabe seems to have been posthumous to the seminal articles) was to start with a relativistic spinning fluid in a region space. The fluid is defined by a rest mass density ρ0, a flow velocity four-vector field u = uµ ∂µ, an energy-momentum density covector field g = gµ dxµ, and a spin density tensor field sν µ, which one represents as a 0-form with values in so(1, 3)*. The support of ρ0 is R, by the definition of R, and the supports of the other fields are then contained in R. As we shall see, the density ρ0 can actually be obtained from g, so it cannot be specified independently of g. Since the basic equations of motion/equilibrium are still the conservation laws for mass, energy-momentum and angular momentum that one uses for relativistic Cosserat media, the Weyssenhoff fluid represents an example of a relativistic Cosserat medium that is obtained by specializing the form of the stress-energy-momentum and couplestress-angular-momentum tensor to a particular form that was motivated by Frenkel’s relativistic equations of motion for a spinning point-like electron, as well as the tensorial form of the Dirac electron. a. The basic fields. The basic fields are then subjected to various constraints that basically grow out of the properties of the Dirac electron. First of all, the flow velocity vector field is assumed to be time-like and proper-time parameterized, so one must have: u2 = c2

Discussion. - The work of the Cosserat brothers (1 ) on the description of the equilibrium and motion of deformable bodies that admitted internal couple-stresses by means of action functionals that were invariant under Euclidian rigid motions was originally known to only a few enlightened figures in theoretical mechanics and mathematics. It was resurrected in the’s by a school of researchers that largely worked in non-relativistic continuum mechanics, although Hehl [10] did suggest at that time that the concept of a Cosserat medium might be analogous to the geometry of spacetime when one extended general relativity from Riemannian geometry to Riemann-Cartan geometry by the addition of non-vanishing torsion. However, the details of how one would generalize a Cosserat medium from non-relativistic to relativistic continuum mechanics was never addressed in a thorough manner, although it was implicitly included in Pommaret’s treatment [11] of Cosserat media with the methods of Lie groupoids and Lie equations. Some of the reason for that might be that most of the literature on the Cosserat equations (except for the Pommaret book and a paper by Schaefer that is also cited in started with those equations as given a priori without taking the time to derive those equations from first principles, while the derivation that was given by the Cosserat’s was hampered by the fact that Noether’s theorem was conspicuous by its absence, due to the fact the Cosserat book was published several years before Noether’s paper on invariant variational problems. Interestingly, when Sudria see Part I revisited the theory of Euclidian-invariant action functionals more than a decade after Noether’s theorem was published, he made no mention of it, either. Hence, one should never assume that merely because some fundamental result was in print during some era of history, the entire research community was immediately aware of its existence. Indeed, in the thirty-five years that followed the publication of Mendel’s laws of genetics, his

Berlin, 1968), pp. 347-349. 11. J. F. Pommaret Lie Pseudogroups in Mechanics NY,. (* ) References marked with an asterisk are available in English translation at the author’s website: neo-classical-physics.info