On Small Satellites for Oceanography: A Survey

The recent explosive growth of small satellite operations driven primarily from an academic or pedagogical need, has demonstrated the viability of commercial-off-the-shelf technologies in space. They have also leveraged and shown the need for development of compatible sensors primarily aimed for Earth observation tasks including monitoring terrestrial domains, communications and engineering tests. However, one domain that these platforms have not yet made substantial inroads into, is in the ocean sciences. Remote sensing has long been within the repertoire of tools for oceanographers to study dynamic large scale physical phenomena, such as gyres and fronts, bio-geochemical process transport, primary productivity and process studies in the coastal ocean. We argue that the time has come for micro and nano satellites (with mass smaller than 100 kg and 2 to 3 year development times) designed, built, tested and flown by academic departments, for coordinated observations with robotic assets in situ. We do so primarily by surveying SmallSat missions oriented towards ocean observations in the recent past, and in doing so, we update the current knowledge about what is feasible in the rapidly evolving field of platforms and sensors for this domain. We conclude by proposing a set of candidate ocean observing missions with an emphasis on radar-based observations, with a focus on Synthetic Aperture Radar.

Note:

63 pages, 4 figures, 8 tables

References(131)

Figures(4)

[1]

National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Scientific Accomplishments of Earth Observations from Space, Earth Observations from Space: the First 50 Years of Scientific Achievements, vol. 244, National Academies Press

D.C Washington

[2]

Yakov Alpert Sputnik-1 and the first satellite ionospheric experiment

V. Kuznetsov
,
V. Sinelnikov
,
S. Alpert

- Adv.Space Res. 55 (2015) 2833
•
DOI:
- 10.1016/j.asr.2015.02.033

[3]

The Spacecrafts Encyclopedia, accessed on 10th of November(2014). URL 〈〉

C. Lafleur

[4]

A survey and assessment of the capabilities of Cubesats for Earth observation

D. Selva
,
D. Krejci

- Acta Astronaut. 74 (2012) 50
•
DOI:
- 10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.12.014

[5]

Spacecraft Systems Engineering

P. Fortescue
,
J. Stark
,
G. Swinerd

[6]

Space Mission Analysis and Design

W.J. Larson
,
J.R. Wertz

[7]

Status and trends of small satellite missions for Earth observation

R. Sandau

- Acta Astronaut. 66 (2010) 1
•
DOI:
- 10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.06.008

[8]

International study on cost-effective earth observation missions outcomes and visions, Revue française de photogrammétrie et de télédétection (185) 5-10

R. Sandau

[9]

The first one hundred CubeSats a statistical look

M. Swartwout

- J.Small Satell. 2 (2013) 213

[10]

Present and future picosatellite missions at TU Berlin, in: 8th IAA Symposium on Small Satellites for Earth Observation, Berlin,, pp. 49-52

K. Briess
,
F. Baumann
,
S. Trowitzsch

[11]

CubeSats: a bright future for nanosatellites, Central Eng., vol. 1 (1),, pp. 9-15

Eur. J.

•
DOI:
- 10.2478/s13531-011-0007-8

[12]

Secondary spacecraft in: analyzing success and failure, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference pp. 1-12

M. Swartwout

•
DOI:
- 10.1109/AERO.2015.7119175

[13]

The long-threatened flood of university-class spacecraft (and CubeSats) has come: analyzing the numbers, in: 27th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, no. SSC13-IX-01, Logan, Utah

M. Swartwout

[14]

The CubeSat Program, CubeSat Design Specification

[15]

Satellite oceanography and climate change

C. Garcia-Soto
,
J. Vazquez-Cuervo
,
P. Clemente-Colón
,
F. Hernandez

- Deep.Sea Res.Part II Top.Stud.Ocean. 77-80 (2012) 1
•
DOI:
- 10.1016/j.dsr2.2012.07.004

[16]

Observation of the Earth and its Environment: Survey of Missions and Sensors

H.J. Kramer

•
DOI:
- 10.1007/978-3-642-97678-0

[17]

Discovering the Ocean from Space

I.S. Robinson

•
DOI:
- 10.1007/978-3-540-68322-3

[18]

Lagrangian Coherent Structures

George Haller
(
- ETH, Zurich (main)
)

- Ann.Rev.Fluid Mech. 47 (2015) 1, 137-162
•
DOI:
- 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141322

[19]

Mobile autonomous process sampling within coastal ocean observing systems

J.P. Ryan
,
S. Johnson
,
A. Sherman
,
K. Rajan
,
F. Py

et al.

- Limnol.Ocean.Methods 8 (2010) 394

[20]

Boundary influences on HAB phytoplankton ecology in a stratification-enhanced upwelling shadow, Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography (0)

J.P. Ryan
,
M.A. McManus
,
R.M. Kudela
,
M.L. Artigas
,
J.G. Bellingham

et al.

[21]

Chasing Fish: Tracking and control in a autonomous multi-vehicle real-world experiment, in: MTS/ Oceans, San Diego, California

J. Pinto
,
M. Faria
,
J. Fortuna
,
R. Martins
,
J. Sousa

et al.

[22]

Coordinating UAVs and AUVs for oceanographic field experiments: challenges and lessons learned, in: International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Hong Kong

M. Faria
,
J. Pinto
,
F. Py
,
J. Fortuna
,
H. Dias

et al.

[23]

Data-driven robotic sampling for marine ecosystem monitoring, Int. J Robot. Res

J. Das
,
F. Py
,
J. Harvey
,
J. Ryan
,
A. Gellene

et al.

DOI:
- 10.1177/0278364915587723

[24]

IPCC,: Climate Change: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Tech. Rep., IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland

Groups I

[25]

International scientific micro-satellite RISESAT based on space plug and play avionics, in: Proceedings of the 26th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Logan, Utah

T. Kuwahara
,
K. Yoshida
,
Y. Sakamoto
,
Y. Tomioka
,
K. Fukuda

et al.

1-25 of 131
1
2
3
4
5
6
25 / page