ULXs: Neutron stars versus black holes
Jan 14, 20164 pages
Published in:
- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 458 (2016) 1, L10-L13
- Published: May 1, 2016
e-Print:
- 1601.03738 [astro-ph.HE]
View in:
Citations per year
Abstract: (Oxford University Press)
We consider ultraluminous X–ray systems (ULXs) where the accretor is a neutron star rather than a black hole. We show that the recently discovered example (M82 X–2) fits naturally into the simple picture of ULXs as beamed X–ray sources fed at super-Eddington rates, provided that its magnetic field is weaker (≃10^11G) than a new-born X-ray pulsar, as expected if there has been mass gain. Continuing accretion is likely to weaken the field to the point that pulsing stops, and make the system indistinguishable from a ULX containing a black hole. Accordingly we suggest that a significant fraction of all ULXs may actually contain neutron star accretors rather than black holes, reflecting the neutron-star fraction among their X-ray binary progenitors. We emphasize that neutron-star ULXs are likely to have higher apparent luminosities than black hole ULXs for a given mass transfer rate, as their tighter beaming outweighs their lower Eddington luminosities. This further increases the likely proportion of neutron-star accretors among all ULXs. Cygnus X–2 is probably a typical descendant of neutron-star ULXs, which may therefore ultimately end as millisecond pulsar binaries with massive white dwarf companions.Note:
- 4 pages, accepted for publication as a Letter in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- accretion, accretion discs
- black hole physics
- binaries: close
- pulsars: general
- X-rays: binaries
References(37)
Figures(0)