Global structure of static spherically symmetric solutions surrounded by quintessence

Feb 6, 2017
35 pages
Published in:
  • Class.Quant.Grav. 34 (2017) 12, 125014
  • Published: May 24, 2017
e-Print:

Citations per year

2014201720202023202401234567
Abstract: (IOP)
We investigate all static spherically symmetric solutions in the context of general relativity surrounded by a minimally-coupled quintessence field, using dynamical system analysis. Applying the 1  +  1  +  2 formalism and introducing suitable normalized variables involving the Gaussian curvature, we were able to reformulate the field equations as first order differential equations. In the case of a massless canonical scalar field we recovered all known black hole results, such as the Fisher solution, and we found that apart from the Schwarzschild solution all other solutions are naked singularities. Additionally, we identified the symmetric phase space which corresponds to the white hole part of the solution and in the case of a phantom field, we were able to extract the conditions for the existence of wormholes and define all possible classes of solutions such as cold black holes, singular spacetimes and wormholes such as the Ellis wormhole, for example. For an exponential potential, we found that the black hole solution which is asymptotically flat is unique and it is the Schwarzschild spacetime, while all other solutions are naked singularities. Furthermore, we found solutions connecting to a white hole through a maximum radius, and not a minimum radius (throat) such as wormhole solutions, therefore violating the flare-out condition. Finally, we have found a necessary and sufficient condition on the form of the potential to have an asymptotically AdS spacetime along with a necessary condition for the existence of asymptotically flat black holes.
Note:
  • 37 pages, 5 figures; Accepted for publication in Class. Quantum Grav
  • space-time: anti-de Sitter
  • space-time: Schwarzschild
  • black hole
  • wormhole
  • quintessence
  • singularity
  • differential equations
  • general relativity
  • dynamical system
  • field equations
  • PM: (x_2=1, x_3=0). The corresponding eigenvalues are -2, -1, and thus this point is a local sink, i.e. stable point
    • P¯M: (x_2=-1, x_3=0). The corresponding eigenvalues are 2, 1, and thus this point is a local source, i.e. unstable point
      • PM: (x_2=1, x_3=0, y_1=0). The corresponding eigenvalues are 2, -1, -1, and therefore this point is saddle
        • P¯M: (x_2=-1, x_3=0, y_1=0). The corresponding eigenvalues are -2, 1, 1, and thus this point is saddle
          • PM: (x_2=1, x_3=0, y_1=0, \lambda=\lambda_{\rm c}). The corresponding eigenvalues are 2, -1, -1, 0
            • P¯M: (x_2=-1, x_3=0, y_1=0, \lambda=\lambda_{\rm c}). The corresponding eigenvalues are -2, 1, 1, 0
              • Q(λ): (x_2, x_3, y_1, \lambda)= \left(\frac{{\lambda^\star}^2}{\sqrt{{\lambda^\star}^4-4}}, \frac{2}{\sqrt{{\lambda^\star}^4-4}}, \frac{\sqrt{2} \lambda ^\star}{\sqrt{{\lambda^\star}^4-4}}, \lambda ^\star\right)
                • Q¯(λ): (x_2, x_3, y_1, \lambda)= \left(-\frac{{\lambda^\star}^2}{\sqrt{{\lambda^\star}^4-4}}, -\frac{2}{\sqrt{{\lambda^\star}^4-4}}, -\frac{\sqrt{2} \lambda ^\star}{\sqrt{{\lambda^\star}^4-4}}, \lambda ^\star\right)
                  • PH: \left(0, 1, 0, \lambda_{\rm c}\right) with \lambda_{\rm c}\in\mathbb{R}. The eigenvalues are 2, 2, 0, 0, thus the point is nonhyperbolic. The center manifold of PH is the 2-dimensional surface defined by the boundary of M
                    • X_2+X_3-\sqrt{1-X_2^2}=0, X_2^2+X_3^2+Y_1^2=1, \lambda\in\mathbb{R} and the critical point is unstable (see the full analysis in appendix, A.5: #cqgaa70fcapp1-5). This point corresponds to the horizon as analyzed previously
                      • PS: \left(\frac{2}{\sqrt{5}}, -\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}, 0, \lambda_{\rm c}\right) with \lambda_{\rm c}\in\mathbb{R}. The eigenvalues are \frac{6}{\sqrt{5}}, \frac{2}{\sqrt{5}}, 0, 0, thus the point is nonhyperbolic. The center manifold of PS is the same as for PH and it is also unstable (see the full analysis in appendix, A.6: #cqgaa70fcapp1-6). As seen, in the massless case, this point corresponds to a singularity where A(r)=B(r)\simeq r^{-1}
                        • P(λ): \left(\sqrt{\frac{2}{{\lambda ^\star}^2+4}}, \sqrt{\frac{2}{{\lambda ^\star}^2+4}}, \frac{\lambda ^\star}{\sqrt{{\lambda ^\star}^2+4}}, \lambda ^\star\right). It exists for f(\lambda ^\star)=0, {\lambda ^\star}^2\geqslant 6. The eigenvalues are \frac{{\lambda ^\star}^2-6}{\sqrt{2({\lambda ^\star}^2+4)}}, \frac{{\lambda ^\star}^2-6}{\sqrt{2({\lambda ^\star}^2+4)}}, \frac{\sqrt{2} \left({\lambda ^\star}^2-2\right)}{\sqrt{{\lambda ^\star}^2+4}}, -\frac{\sqrt{2} \lambda ^\star f^{\prime}(\lambda ^\star)}{\sqrt{{\lambda ^\star}^2+4}}. It is unstable for f^{\prime}(\lambda^\star)<0, \lambda^\star>\sqrt{6}, or f^{\prime}(\lambda^\star)>0, \lambda^\star<-\sqrt{6}, and saddle otherwise. This point has already been studied in the case of an exponential potential
                          • C(λ): is given by the conditions f(\lambda ^\star)=0, 2X_2^2+2X_2X_3+X_3^2=1, X_2^2+X_3^2+Y_1^2=1. This line has already been studied in the exponential potential case where it was represented by the red curve in figure, 3: #cqgaa70fcf03. It is the boundary of M and exists only if f(\lambda) has roots. Notice that for a given root of f(\lambda), this line corresponds to the center manifold of PH and PS. By using the same analysis than the exponential case, we found that the line is unstable for f^{\prime}(\lambda ^\star)<0, \lambda ^\star<\frac{2\cos{\theta}+2\sin\theta}{\sqrt{-1-\cos(2\theta)+2\sin(2\theta)}} and Y1 > 0 or f^{\prime}(\lambda ^\star)>0, \lambda ^\star>-\frac{2\cos{\theta}+2\sin\theta}{\sqrt{-1-\cos(2\theta)+2\sin(2\theta)}} and Y1 < 0 while \arccos(2/\sqrt{5}) < \theta < \pi/2
                            • PAdS: \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}, \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}, 0, 0\right). This point belongs to the phase space (, 60: #cqgaa70fceqn092), that is, it exists only for negative potential V(\psi) < 0. The eigenvalues are -\frac{3}{\sqrt{2}}, -\sqrt{2}, -\frac{\sqrt{9-12 f(0)}+3}{2 \sqrt{2}}, -\frac{3-\sqrt{9-12 f(0)}}{2 \sqrt{2}}. It is a sink for f(0) > 0 and corresponds to AdS spacetime. Thus, the solutions are asymptotically AdS if we impose the condition V(\psi) < 0 and f(0) > 0 (see appendix, A.7: #cqgaa70fcapp1-7 for complete analysis)
                              • M,M¯: 2X_2^2+2X_2X_3+X_3^2=1, v=0. These surfaces are the two boundaries encountered in the exponential case and they correspond to V(\psi)=0. The eigenvalues are 0, 0, -\sqrt{2} Y_1, \sqrt{2} Y_1 (3 \beta_{1}-\beta_{2}), where \beta_1=\lim_{v\rightarrow 0} v^2 f\left(\frac{1}{v}\right), \beta_2=\lim_{v\rightarrow 0} v f^{\prime}\left(\frac{1}{v}\right)\!. These surfaces are saddle for 3 \beta_{1}-\beta_{2}>0. For 3 \beta_{1}-\beta_{2}<0 and depending on the sign of Y1, the surface will be a 2D unstable manifold (respectively, stable manifold) for Y1 < 0 (respectively, Y1 > 0)
                                • P(∞): X_2=0, X_3=0, Y_1=1, v=0. It is the endpoint of the line P(\lambda):=\left(\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{\lambda ^2+4}}, \frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{\lambda ^2+4}}, \frac{\lambda }{\sqrt{\lambda ^2+4}}, \frac{1}{\lambda }\right) as \lambda\rightarrow \infty. The eigenvalues are \sqrt{2}, \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}, \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}, \sqrt{2} (3 \beta_{1}-\beta_{2}). This point is unstable if 3 \beta_{1}-\beta_{2}>0, or saddle otherwise
                                  • P¯(∞): X_2=0, X_3=0, Y_1=-1, v=0. It is the endpoint of the line \bar P(\lambda):=\left(-\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{\lambda ^2+4}}, -\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{\lambda ^2+4}}, -\frac{\lambda }{\sqrt{\lambda ^2+4}}, \frac{1}{\lambda }\right) as \lambda\rightarrow \infty. The eigenvalues are -\sqrt{2}, -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}, -\sqrt{2} (3 \beta_{1}-\beta_{2}). This point is stable if 3 \beta_{1}-\beta_{2}>0, or saddle otherwise
                                    • [2]