Shear measurement bias I: dependencies on methods, simulation parameters and measured parameters - INSPIRE

DataBETA

Shear measurement bias I: dependencies on methods, simulation parameters and measured parameters

Arnau Pujol
(
- IRFU, Saclay and
- AIM, Saclay
)
,
Florent Sureau
(
- IRFU, Saclay and
- AIM, Saclay
)
,
Jerome Bobin
(
- IRFU, Saclay and
- AIM, Saclay
)
,
Frederic Courbin
(
- LASTRO Observ.
)
,
Marc Gentile
(
- LASTRO Observ.
)

Jul 5, 2017

11 pages

Published in:

Astron.Astrophys. 641 (2020) A164

Published: Sep 1, 2020

e-Print:

1707.01285 [astro-ph.CO]

DOI:

10.1051/0004-6361/202038657 (publication)

View in:

ADS Abstract Service

reference search12 citations

Citations per year

Abstract: (EDP Sciences)

We present a study of the dependencies of shear bias on simulation (input) and measured (output) parameters, noise, point-spread function anisotropy, pixel size, and the model bias coming from two different and independent galaxy shape estimators. We used simulated images from GALSIM based on the GREAT3 control-space-constant branch, and we measured shear bias from a model-fitting method (GFIT) and a moment-based method (Kaiser-Squires-Broadhurst). We show the bias dependencies found on input and output parameters for both methods, and we identify the main dependencies and causes. Most of the results are consistent between the two estimators, an interesting result given the differences of the methods. We also find important dependences on orientation and morphology properties such as flux, size, and ellipticity. We show that noise and pixelization play an important role in the bias dependencies on the output properties and galaxy orientation. We show some examples of model bias that produce a bias dependence on the Sérsic index n as well as a different shear bias between galaxies consisting of a single Sérsic profile and galaxies with a disc and a bulge. We also see an important coupling between several properties on the bias dependences. Because of this, we need to study several measured properties simultaneously in order to properly understand the nature of shear bias. This paper serves as a first step towards a companion paper that describes a machine learning approach to modelling shear bias as a complex function of many observed properties.Key words: gravitational lensing: weak / methods: observational / methods: statistical

Note:

13 pages, 7 figures

gravitational lensing: weak
methods: observational
methods: statistical

References(48)

Figures(55)

Systematic Bias in Cosmic Shear: Beyond the Fisher Matrix

Adam Amara
(
- Saclay
)
,
Alexandre Refregier
(
- Saclay
)

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 391 (2008) 228-236
•
e-Print:
- 0710.5171
•
DOI:
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13880.x

Shape measurement biases from underfitting and ellipticity gradients

Gary M. Bernstein

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 406 (2010) 2793
•
e-Print:
- 1001.2333
•
DOI:
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16883.x

Shapes and shears, stars and smears: optimal measurements for weak lensing

- Astron.J. 123 (2002) 583-618
•
e-Print:
- astro-ph/0107431
•
DOI:
- 10.1086/338085

Bayesian Lensing Shear Measurement

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 438 (2014) 2, 1880-1893
•
e-Print:
- 1304.1843
•
DOI:
- 10.1093/mnras/stt2326

SExtractor: Software for source extraction

- Astron.Astrophys.Suppl.Ser. 117 (1996) 393-404
•
DOI:
- 10.1051/aas:1996164

Handbook for the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensing

et al.

- Ann.Appl.Stat. 3 (2009) 6
•
e-Print:
- 0802.1214
•
DOI:
- 10.1214/08-AOAS222

Results of the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensing

et al.

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 405 (2010) 2044
•
e-Print:
- 0908.0945
•
DOI:
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16598.x

Galaxy–galaxy lensing in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data

DES

Collaboration

•

J. Clampitt
(
- Pennsylvania U.
)

et al.

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 465 (2017) 4, 4204-4218
•
e-Print:
- 1603.05790
•
DOI:
- 10.1093/mnras/stw2988

Messenger, 154, 44

J.T.A. de Jong
,
K. Kuijken
,
D. Applegate

Euclid Preparation. IV. Impact of undetected galaxies on weak-lensing shear measurements

Euclid

Collaboration

•

N. Martinet
(
- Argelander Inst. Astron. and
- Marseille, Lab. Astrophys.
)

et al.

- Astron.Astrophys. 627 (2019) A59
•
e-Print:
- 1902.00044
•
DOI:
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201935187

Calibration of weak-lensing shear in the Kilo-Degree Survey

et al.

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 467 (2017) 2, 1627-1651
•
e-Print:
- 1606.05337
•
DOI:
- 10.1093/mnras/stx200

The Dark Energy Survey

DES

Collaboration

•

Brenna Flaugher
(
- Fermilab
)

for the collaboration.

- Int.J.Mod.Phys.A 20 (2005) 3121-3123
•
DOI:
- 10.1142/S0217751X05025917

A simple fitting method (gfit) for galaxy shape measurement in weak lensing surveys

e-Print:
- 1211.4847

Wide-Field InfraRed Survey Telescope (WFIRST) Final Report

et al.

e-Print:
- 1208.4012

Cosmic shear measurement with maximum likelihood and maximum a posteriori inference

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 468 (2017) 1, 346-363
•
e-Print:
- 1603.08431
•
DOI:
- 10.1093/mnras/stx446

The Shear TEsting Programme. 1. Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations

et al.

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 368 (2006) 1323-1339
•
e-Print:
- astro-ph/0506112
•
DOI:
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10198.x

The Canadian Cluster Comparison Project: detailed study of systematics and updated weak lensing masses

et al.

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 449 (2015) 1, 685-714
•
e-Print:
- 1502.01883
•
DOI:
- 10.1093/mnras/stv275

A study of the sensitivity of shape measurements to the input parameters of weak lensing image simulations

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 468 (2017) 3, 3295-3311
•
e-Print:
- 1609.03281
•
DOI:
- 10.1093/mnras/stx724

Metacalibration: Direct Self-Calibration of Biases in Shear Measurement

e-Print:
- 1702.02600

Systematic errors in future weak lensing surveys: Requirements and prospects for self-calibration

Dragan Huterer
(
- Chicago U., KICP and
- Chicago U., Astron. Astrophys. Ctr.
)
,
Masahiro Takada
(
- Tohoku U., Astron. Inst.
)
,
Gary Bernstein
(
- Pennsylvania U.
)
,
Bhuvnesh Jain
(
- Pennsylvania U.
)

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 366 (2006) 101-114
•
e-Print:
- astro-ph/0506030
•
DOI:
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09782.x

The Train Wreck Cluster Abell 520 and the Bullet Cluster 1E0657-558 in a Generalized Theory of Gravitation

- Galaxies 6 (2018) 2, 41
•
e-Print:
- 1606.09128
•
DOI:
- 10.3390/galaxies6020041

Measurement and Calibration of Noise Bias in Weak Lensing Galaxy Shape Estimation

et al.

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 427 (2012) 2711
•
e-Print:
- 1203.5049
•
DOI:
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21622.x

Sérsic galaxy models in weak lensing shape measurement: model bias, noise bias and their interaction

et al.

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 441 (2014) 3, 2528-2538
•
e-Print:
- 1308.4663
•
DOI:
- 10.1093/mnras/stu588

A Method for weak lensing observations

- Astrophys.J. 449 (1995) 460-475
•
e-Print:
- astro-ph/9411005
•
DOI:
- 10.1086/176071

Gravitational Lensing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) Challenge Handbook

et al.

- Ann.Appl.Stat. 5 (2011) 2231-2263
•
e-Print:
- 1009.0779
•
DOI:
- 10.1214/11-AOAS484

1-25 of 48
1
2
25 / page