The radio SED shows both an inversion, above which the emission increases with increasing frequency, and a high-frequency turnover. The inverted part of the spectrum is due to the central component, which is absorbed at low frequencies, thus producing the high-frequency turnover. At low frequencies, the shell emission dominates. The inversion is presently near 2 GHz, and the high-frequency turnover near 15 GHz, and both the inversion and turnover are progressing downward in frequency with time

We performed a Bayesian fit of a model consisting of a shell and a partly absorbed central component to the evolving spectrum. The fit suggests that the optically thin, or intrinsic, spectral indices of the central component and the shell radio emission are consistent with being the same (at \alpha \simeq -0.64). At t = 20 year, the absorption of the central component is produced by material with an emission measure of (1.64\,\pm 0.20)\times {10}^{9} {\mathrm{cm}}^{-6}\,\mathrm{pc}, which is decreasing with time \propto {t}^{-2.72\pm 0.26}. The unabsorbed flux densities of both the central component and the shell are decreasing with time, although that of the central component is decreasing less rapidly, hence the central component becomes ever more dominant. The evolution of the spectrum is approximately consistent with a system with a constant mass and ionization fraction expanding homologously with r\propto {t}^{0.69}

The central component is unlikely to be due to a dense condensation in the CSM, central only in projection, due to its high surface brightness and its long lifetime. It is therefore almost certainly in the physical center of the expanding shell of ejecta

The ionized material responsible for the radio absorption seen toward the central component must be distributed nonuniformly. To provide the necessary absorption with less then 5 M☉ of ionized material in a spherically symmetric distribution probably requires that the ionized material be concentrated toward the center of SN J, and not near the reverse shock

The central component could be explained by SN J being the second supernova in a binary system, with SN J's ejecta interacting with an aspherical region of very dense mass loss from the progenitor, which arose during a period of CE binary evolution when the compact remnant of the first supernova was within the envelope of SN J's progenitor. The central component in this picture is due to the part of the supernova shock, which is interacting with a disk of very dense CSM produced by very high mass loss of the progenitor in the CE phase, while the remainder of the shell is due to less equatorial parts of the shock, which interact with the more normal supergiant wind

The central component could be due to a young PWN

however, the steep intrinsic spectrum and the relatively rapid decay with time of its unabsorbed flux density is not consistent with what is expected

The central component might be due to a newly formed accreting black hole in the center of SN J. However, it has a far higher radio luminosity, both absolutely and in comparison to the X-ray luminosity, than any known stellar-mass black hole systems. On the other hand, not much is known about the characteristics of newly formed black holes in supernovae

IAU Symp. 296, Supernova Environmental Impacts A. Ray and R. A. McCray (eds.)

Proc. of 12th European VLBI Network Symposium and Users Meeting, EVN A. Tarchi, M. Giroletti and L. Feretti (eds.)

a ApJ in press

Crossref:

Crossref:

Crossref:

Crossref:

Crossref: