Modal Noise Mitigation through Fiber Agitation for Fiber-fed Radial Velocity Spectrographs

Optical fiber modal noise is a limiting factor for high precision spectroscopy signal-to-noise in the near-infrared and visible. Unabated, especially when using highly coherent light sources for wavelength calibration, modal noise can induce radial velocity (RV) errors that hinder the discovery of low-mass (and potentially Earth-like) planets. Previous research in this field has found sufficient modal noise mitigation through the use of an integrating sphere, but this requires extremely bright light sources, a luxury not necessarily afforded by the next generation of high-resolution optical spectrographs. Otherwise, mechanical agitation, which “mixes” the fiber’s modal patterns and allows the noise to be averaged over minutes-long exposures, provides some noise reduction but the exact mechanism behind improvement in signal-to-noise and RV drift has not been fully explored or optimized by the community. Therefore, we have filled out the parameter space of modal noise agitation techniques in order to better understand agitation’s contribution to mitigating modal noise and to discover a better method for agitating fibers. We find that modal noise is best suppressed by the quasi-chaotic motion of two high-amplitude agitators oscillating with varying phase for fibers with large core diameters and low azimuthal symmetry. This work has subsequently influenced the design of a fiber agitator, to be installed with the EXtreme PREcision Spectrograph, that we estimate will reduce modal-noise-induced RV error to less than 3.2 cm s−1.

Note:

Accepted by The Astrophysical Journal

instrumentation: spectrographs
techniques: radial velocities

References(69)

Figures(13)

[1]

increase with larger fiber core cross-sectional area

Lemke

[1]

: #apjaaa487bib32)

Sablowski

[2]

decrease with larger focal ratios (Baudrand & Walker,: #apjaaa487bib1

[2]

: #apjaaa487bib32)

Sablowski

[3]

decrease with longer wavelength of injected light (Baudrand & Walker,: #apjaaa487bib1)

[4]

slightly increase with more static bends in the fiber (changing the NA

[4]

Imai & Asakura,: #apjaaa487bib17)

[5]

remain the same for differing fiber lengths greater than a few meters (Baudrand & Walker,: #apjaaa487bib1), and

[6]

improve for non-circular fibers over circular fibers

Sablowski

[6]

: #apjaaa487bib36)

Stürmer

[1]

temperature variation

[2]

fiber input illumination variation, and

[3]

fiber movement (bending, twisting, etc.)

[1]

The frequency of agitation should be greater than 1/\tau, where τ is the exposure time (Baudrand & Walker,: #apjaaa487bib1)

[2]

Noise is more effectively reduced by high-amplitude motion

Lemke

[2]

: #apjaaa487bib23)

McCoy

[3]

More oscillations per exposure time (with an upper limit) provide further noise reduction

Lemke

[4]

woofer

Plavchan

[5]

Hand agitation is better than any form of mechanical agitation

Lemke

[5]

: #apjaaa487bib23

McCoy

[5]

: #apjaaa487bib22

Mahadevan

[5]

: #apjaaa487bib31)

Roy

[6]

Non-harmonic or chaotic motion is recommended (Grupp,: #apjaaa487bib11) though an exact method has not yet been experimentally tested

[1]

The fiber being actively agitated

[2]

unagitated

1-25 of 69
1
2
3
25 / page