Investing for Discovery in Astronomy

Jul 25, 2019
9 pages
e-Print:

Citations per year

0 Citations
Abstract: (arXiv)
How should we invest our available resources to best sustain astronomy's track record of discovery, established over the past few decades? Two strong hints come from (1) our history of astronomical discoveries and (2) literature citation patterns that reveal how discovery and development activities in science are strong functions of team size. These argue that progress in astronomy hinges on support for a diversity of research efforts in terms of team size, research tools and platforms, and investment strategies that encourage risk taking. These ideas also encourage us to examine the implications of the trend toward "big team science" and "survey science" in astronomy over the past few decades, and to reconsider the common assumption that progress in astronomy always means "trading up" to bigger apertures and facilities. Instead, the considerations above argue that we need a balanced set of investments in small- to large-scale initiatives and team sizes both large and small. Large teams tend to develop existing ideas, whereas small teams are more likely to fuel the future with disruptive discoveries. While large facilities are the "value" investments that are guaranteed to produce discoveries, smaller facilities are the "growth stocks" that are likely to deliver the biggest science bang per buck, sometimes with outsize returns. One way to foster the risk taking that fuels discovery is to increase observing opportunity, i.e., create more observing nights and facilitate the exploration of science-ready data.
Note:
  • 9 pages; Astro2020 APC white paper. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1901.08605
  • [1]
    Astronomy’s continued success requires rebalanced support for a diversity of research efforts in terms of team size (large or small), research tools and platforms (e.g., large or small aperture
    • [1]
      tried-and-true workhorse or state-of-the art instrumentation), and support for risk taking, as argued by our own historical record of discovery
      • [2]
        Access to observing opportunity is the incubator for small team science in astronomy. The work of large and small groups is synergistic, with discoveries generated by small research teams often becoming the hot topics that large teams develop. Support for small and large teams is needed to enable both discovery/disruption and development in astronomy, which are critical to the advancement of our field
        • [3]
          We need to balance investment in large facilities (ELTs or other future facilities) and large team science with continued access by smaller groups and individuals to observing opportunities on facilities of all sizes. Observing opportunities for small teams are potentially under threat from both the continued trend toward big team science in astronomy and the continued quest for ever-larger facilities
          • [4]
            Risk taking, which is critical to continued discovery in astronomy, can be fostered by increasing observing opportunity, i.e., creating more observing nights and facilitating the exploration of science-ready data. Low cost options including (1) NSF buyback of observing time on federal facilities previously targeted for divestment, (2) use of MSIP to purchase observing time on non-federal facilities, (3) funding for instrument development on non-federal facilities in exchange for open access observing nights, (4) funding for science platforms and efficient access to high-level archival data products that enable unanticipated discoveries