Linearized optimal transport for collider events - INSPIRE

DataBETA

Linearized optimal transport for collider events

Tianji Cai
(
- UC, Santa Barbara
)
,
Junyi Cheng
(
- UC, Santa Barbara
)
,
Nathaniel Craig
(
- UC, Santa Barbara, Dept. Math.
)
,
Katy Craig
(
- UC, Santa Barbara
)

Aug 19, 2020

17 pages

Published in:

Phys.Rev.D 102 (2020) 11, 116019

Published: Dec 30, 2020

e-Print:

2008.08604 [hep-ph]

DOI:

10.1103/PhysRevD.102.116019

View in:

ADS Abstract Service

reference search30 citations

Citations per year

Abstract: (APS)

We introduce an efficient framework for computing the distance between collider events using the tools of Linearized Optimal Transport (LOT). This preserves many of the advantages of the recently introduced Energy Mover’s Distance, which quantifies the work required to rearrange one event into another, while significantly reducing the computational cost. It also furnishes a Euclidean embedding amenable to simple machine learning algorithms and visualization techniques, which we demonstrate in a variety of jet tagging examples. The LOT approximation lowers the threshold for diverse applications of the theory of optimal transport to collider physics.

Note:

16 pages, 5 figures

Phenomenological aspects of field theory, general methods
Euclidean
embedding
costs

References(48)

Figures(5)

[1]

Metric Space of Collider Events

Patrick T. Komiske
(
- MIT, Cambridge, CTP
)
,
Eric M. Metodiev
(
- Harvard U.
)
,
Jesse Thaler
(
- Harvard U.
)

- Phys.Rev.Lett. 123 (2019) 4, 041801
•
e-Print:
- 1902.02346
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.041801

[2]

The Hidden Geometry of Particle Collisions

- JHEP 07 (2020) 006
•
e-Print:
- 2004.04159
•
DOI:
- 10.1007/JHEP07(2020)006

[3]

Exploring the Space of Jets with CMS Open Data

Patrick T. Komiske
(
- MIT, Cambridge, CTP and
- Harvard U.
)
,
Radha Mastandrea
(
- MIT, Cambridge, CTP
)
,
Eric M. Metodiev
(
- MIT, Cambridge, CTP and
- Harvard U.
)
,
Preksha Naik
(
- MIT, Cambridge, CTP
)
,
Jesse Thaler
(
- MIT, Cambridge, CTP and
- Harvard U.
)

- Phys.Rev.D 101 (2020) 3, 034009
•
e-Print:
- 1908.08542
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.034009

[4]

A Robust Measure of Event Isotropy at Colliders

Cari Cesarotti
(
- Harvard U.
)
,
Jesse Thaler
(
- MIT, Cambridge, CTP
)

- JHEP 08 (2020) 084
•
e-Print:
- 2004.06125
•
DOI:
- 10.1007/JHEP08(2020)084

[5]

Variational autoencoders for anomalous jet tagging

Taoli Cheng
(
- U. Montreal (main)
)
,
Jean-François Arguin
(
- Montreal U.
)
,
Julien Leissner-Martin
(
- Montreal U.
)
,
Jacinthe Pilette
(
- Montreal U.
)
,
Tobias Golling
(
- U. Geneva (main)
)

- Phys.Rev.D 107 (2023) 1, 016002
•
e-Print:
- 2007.01850
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.016002

[6]

Use of a generalized energy Mover’s distance in the search for rare phenomena at colliders

- Eur.Phys.J.C 81 (2021) 2, 192
•
e-Print:
- 2004.09360
•
DOI:
- 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08891-6

[7]

Does SUSY have friends? A new approach for LHC event analysis

Anna Mullin
(
- ARC, CoEPP, Australia and
- Adelaide U., Sch. Chem. Phys.
)
,
Stuart Nicholls
(
- Adelaide U., Sch. Chem. Phys. and
- ARC, CoEPP, Australia
)
,
Holly Pacey
(
- Cambridge U.
)
,
Michael Parker
(
- Cambridge U.
)
,
Martin White
(
- Adelaide U., Sch. Chem. Phys. and
- ARC, CoEPP, Australia
)

et al.

- JHEP 02 (2021) 160
•
e-Print:
- 1912.10625
•
DOI:
- 10.1007/JHEP02(2021)160

[8]

Quantum Algorithms for Jet Clustering

Annie Y. Wei
(
- MIT, Cambridge, CTP
)
,
Preksha Naik
(
- MIT, Cambridge, CTP
)
,
Aram W. Harrow
(
- MIT, Cambridge, CTP
)
,
Jesse Thaler
(
- MIT, Cambridge, CTP and
- Harvard U.
)

- Phys.Rev.D 101 (2020) 9, 094015
•
e-Print:
- 1908.08949
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.094015

[9]

W. Wang
,
D. Slepčev
,
S. Basu
,
J.A. Ozolek
,
G.K. Rohde

- Int.J.Comput.Vis. 101 (2013) 254
•
DOI:
- 10.1007/s11263-012-0566-z

[10]

Cutting Multiparticle Correlators Down to Size

Patrick T. Komiske
(
- MIT, Cambridge, CTP and
- Harvard U.
)
,
Eric M. Metodiev
(
- Harvard U. and
- MIT, Cambridge, CTP
)
,
Jesse Thaler
(
- MIT, Cambridge, CTP and
- Harvard U.
)

- Phys.Rev.D 101 (2020) 3, 036019
•
e-Print:
- 1911.04491
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.036019

[11]

L.G. Hanin

- Proc.Am.Math.Soc. 115 (1992) 345
•
DOI:
- 10.1090/S0002-9939-1992-1097344-5

[12]

B. Piccoli
,
F. Rossi

- Arch.Ration.Mech.Anal. 211 (2014) 335
•
DOI:
- 10.1007/s00205-013-0669-x

[13]

B. Piccoli
,
F. Rossi

- Arch.Ration.Mech.Anal. 222 (2016) 1339
•
DOI:
- 10.1007/s00205-016-1026-7

[14]

M. Thorpe
,
S. Park
,
S. Kolouri
,
G.K. Rohde
,
D. Slepčev

- J.Math.Imaging Vision 59 (2017) 187
•
DOI:
- 10.1007/s10851-017-0726-4

[15]

European Conference on Computer Vision

O. Pele
,
M. Werman

[16]

2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision

O. Pele
,
M. Werman

[17]

The Earth Mover's Distance as a Metric for Image Retrieval

- Int.J.Comput.Vision 40 (2000) 2, 99-121
•
DOI:
- 10.1023/A:1026543900054

[18]

W. Wang
,
J.A. Ozolek
,
D. Slepčev
,
A.B. Lee
,
C. Chen

et al.

- IEEE Trans.Med.Imag. 30 (2010) 621
•
DOI:
- 10.1109/TMI.2010.2089693

[19]

J. Delon

- J.Math.Imaging Vision 21 (2004) 119
•
DOI:
- 10.1023/B:JMIV.0000035178.72139.2d

[20]

Adv.Neural Inf.Process.Syst.

J. Altschuler
,
J. Niles-Weed
,
P. Rigollet

[21]

D.P. Bertsekas

- Math.Programming 21 (1981) 152
•
DOI:
- 10.1007/BF01584237

[22]

D.P. Bertsekas
,
J. Eckstein

- Math.Programming 42 (1988) 203
•
DOI:
- 10.1007/BF01589405

[23]

Adv.Neural Inf.Process.Syst.

M. Cuturi

[24]

G. Peyré
,
M. Cuturi

- Found.Trends Mach.Learn. 11 (2019) 355
•
DOI:
- 10.1561/2200000073

[25]

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics

Q. Mérigot
,
A. Delalande
,
F. Chazal

1-25 of 48
1
2
25 / page