Observation and origin of non-thermal hard X-rays from Jupiter

Feb 10, 2022
7 pages
Published in:
  • Nature Astron. 6 (2022) 4, 442-448
  • Published: Feb 10, 2022
e-Print:

Citations per year

202220232024012
Abstract: (submitter)
Electrons accelerated on Earth by a rich variety of wave scattering or stochastic processes generate hard non-thermal X-ray bremsstrahlung up to >~ 1 MeV and power Earth's various types of aurorae. Although Jupiter's magnetic field is an order of magnitude larger than Earth's, space-based telescopes have previously detected X-rays only up to ~7 keV. On the basis of theoretical models of the Jovian auroral X-ray production, X-ray emission in the ~2-7 keV band has been interpreted as thermal (arising from electrons characterized by a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution) bremsstrahlung. Here we report the observation of hard X-rays in the 8-20 keV band from the Jovian aurorae, obtained with the NuSTAR X-ray observatory. The X-rays fit to a flat power-law model with slope 0.60+/-0.22 - a spectral signature of non-thermal, hard X-ray bremsstrahlung. We determine the electron flux and spectral shape in the keV to MeV energy range using coeval in situ measurements by the Juno spacecraft's JADE and JEDI instruments. Jovian electron spectra of the form we observe have previously been interpreted to arise in stochastic acceleration, rather than coherent acceleration by electric fields. We reproduce the X-ray spectral shape and approximate flux observed by NuSTAR, and explain the non-detection of hard X-rays by Ulysses, by simulating the non-thermal population of electrons undergoing precipitating electron energy loss, secondary electron generation and bremsstrahlung emission in a model Jovian atmosphere. The results highlight the similarities between the processes generating hard X-ray auroras on Earth and Jupiter, which may be occurring on Saturn, too.
Note:
  • [1]
    Investigation of EMIC wave scattering as the cause for the BARREL 17 January 2013 relativistic electron precipitation event: A quantitative comparison of simulation with observations
    • Z. Li
      • Geophys.Res.Lett. 41 (2014) 8722-8729
  • [2]
    Precipitation of relativistic electrons by interaction with electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves
    • K.R. Lorentzen
      • J.Geophys.Res. 105 (2000) 5381-5390
  • [3]
    X-ray observations of MeV electron precipitation with a balloon-borne germanium spectrometer
    • R.M. Millan
      ,
    • R.P. Lin
      ,
    • D.M. Smith
      ,
    • K.R. Lorentzen
      ,
    • M.P. McCarthy
      • Geophys.Res.Lett. 29 (2002) 2194
  • [4]
    First detection of a terrestrial MeV X-ray burst
    • J.E. Foat
      • Geophys.Res.Lett. 25 (1998) 4109-4112
  • [6]
    rays from Jovian auroral electrons
    • Barbosa
      ,
    • D.D. Bremsstrahlung, X
      • J.Geophys.Res. 95 (1990) 14969-14976
  • [7]
    J. H., Boice, D. C., Hurley, K. C., Stern, S. A. & Sommer, M
    • J. Waite
      • Geophys.Res.Lett. 19 (1992) 83-86
  • [8]
    Energetic electron precipitation in Jupiter’s upper atmosphere
    • R.P. Singhal
      ,
    • S.C. Chakravarty
      ,
    • A. Bhardwaj
      ,
    • B. Prasad
      • J.Geophys.Res. 97 (1992) 18245-18256
  • [9]
    Temporal and Spectral Studies by XMM-Newton of Jupiter’s X-ray Auroras
    • A.D. Wibisono
      • J.Geophys.Res.Space Phys. 125 (2020) e27676
  • [10]
    Discrete and broadband electron acceleration in Jupiter’s powerful aurora
    • B.H. Mauk
      • Nature 549 (2017) 66-69
  • [11]
    Upper limits to Jovian hard X radiation from the Ulysses gamma ray burst experiment
    • K. Hurley
      ,
    • M. Sommer
      ,
    • J.H. Waite
      • J.Geophys.Res. 98 (1993) 21217-21220
  • [13]
    The impact of an ICME on the Jovian X-ray aurora
    • W.R. Dunn
      • J.Geophys.Res.Space Phys. 121 (2016) 2274-2307
  • [14]
    Assessing Quasi-Periodicities in Jovian X-Ray Emissions
    • C.M. Jackman
      • J.Geophys.Res.Space Phys. 123 (2018) 9204-9221
  • [15]
    Origin of the main auroral oval in Jupiter’s coupled magnetosphere-ionosphere system
    • S.W.H. Cowley
      ,
    • E.J. Bunce
      • Planet.Space Sci. 49 (2001) 1067-1088
  • [16]
    The independent pulsations of Jupiter’s northern and southern X-ray auroras
    • W.R. Dunn
      • Nature Astron. 1 (2017) 758-764
  • [17]
    Birkeland currents in Jupiter’s magnetosphere observed by the polarorbiting Juno spacecraft
    • S. Kotsiaros
      • Nature Astron. 3 (2019) 904-909
  • [18]
    Energetic particle signatures of magnetic field-aligned potentials over Jupiter’s polar regions
    • G. Clark
      • Geophys.Res.Lett. 44 (2017) 8703-8711
  • [19]
    Electron beams and loss cones in the auroral regions of Jupiter
    • F. Allegrini
      • Geophys.Res.Lett. 44 7131-7139
  • [20]
    A New Model
    • J.E.P. Connerney
      • Geophys.Res.Lett. 45 (2018) 2590-2596
  • [21]
    Precipitating Electron Energy Flux and Characteristic Energies in Jupiter’s Main Auroral Region as Measured by Juno/JEDI
    • G. Clark
      • J.Geophys.Res.Space Phys. 123 (2018) 7554-7567
  • [22]

    Collaboration
  • [23]
    Composition and origin of the atmosphere of Jupiter — an update, and implications for the extrasolar giant planets
    • S. Atreya
      ,
    • P. Mahaffy
      ,
    • H. Niemann
      ,
    • M. Wong
      ,
    • T. Owen
      • Planet.Space Sci. 51 (2003) 105-112
  • [24]
    Jupiter - Structure and composition of the upper atmosphere
    • S.K. Atreya
      ,
    • T.M. Donahue
      ,
    • M. Festou
      • Astrophys.J.Lett. 247 (1981) L43-L47
  • [25]
    A summary of the BARREL campaigns: Technique for studying electron precipitation
    • L.A. Woodger
      • J.Geophys.Res.Space Phys. 120 (2015) 4922-4935