Simple precession calculation for Mercury: A linearization approach

Jun 23, 2022
4 pages
Published in:
  • Am.J.Phys. 90 (2022) 11, 857,
  • Am.J.Phys. 90 (2022) 857-860
  • Published: Oct 21, 2022
e-Print:

Citations per year

20222023202401
Abstract: (AIP)
The additional perihelion precession of Mercury due to general relativity can be calculated by a method that is no more difficult than solving for the Newtonian orbit. This method relies on linearizing the relativistic orbit equation, is simpler than standard textbook methods, and is closely related to Newton's theorem on revolving orbits. The main result is accurate for all values of GM/c2 for near-circular orbits.
Note:
  • 4 pages, submitted to Am J Phys
  • [1]

    Erklärung der perihelbewegung des merkur aus der allgemeinen relativitätstheorie

    • A. Einstein
      • Sitzungsber.Preuss.Akad.Wiss.Berlin (Math.Phys.) 47 (1915) 831-839
  • [3]
    Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems, 5th ed. ( Brooks/Cole, Belmont,), Secs. 8.4 and 8.9, pp. 291-295 and 312-316
    • S.T. Thornton
      ,
    • J.B. Marion
  • [4]

    Relativity: Special, general, and cosmological

    • W. Rindler
  • [5]
    Essential Dynamics and Relativity ( CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL,), Sec. 5.8, pp. 127-129
    • P.J. O'Donnell
  • [6]
    Gravitational and Cosmology
    • S. Weinberg
  • [7]

    An introduction to Einstein's general relativity

    • J.B. Hartle
  • [8]
    General Relativity: An Introduction to Black Holes, Gravitational Waves, and Cosmology ( Morgan & Claypool/
    • M.J.W. Hall
  • [9]

    Precession of the perihelion of Mercury's orbit

    • M.G. Stewart
  • [10]

    A simple approach to the experimental consequences of general relativity

    • P. Rowlands
  • [11]

    Rearing its ugly head: The cosmological constant and Newton's greatest blunder

    • H.D. Nguyen
  • [13]
    Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, translated by A. Motte and F. Cajori
    • I. Newton
  • [14]
    Newton's Principia for the Common Reader
    • S. Chandrasekhar
  • [15]
    Note also in both Eqs. (2) and (9) that 1/u0 is equal to the orbital distance at the angle halfway from perihelion to aphelion (corresponding to the semilatus rectum for elliptical orbits)
    • [16]
      One can alternatively obtain this result by dividing Eq. (7) by K to give d2ud(√Kϕ)2+u=L/K, which is equivalent to the Newtonian orbit equation (1) with ϕ replaced by √Kϕ
      • [17]
        The same result is obtained if one averages over many orbits, corresponding to ˉu=lim Φ→∞ 1Φ∫Φ0dϕ u(ϕ)
        • [18]
          Planetary data are available at, e.g., the NASA website <> (accessed on July)
        • [20]

          Advance of perihelion

          • K.-H. Lo
            ,
          • K. Young
            ,
          • B.Y.P. Lee
        • [21]
          The self-consistency condition in Eq. (31) of Ref. 12 is e+3(GMjc)2(e+2)≪1
          • [22]

            The first-order orbital equation

            • M.M. D'Eliseo
          • [23]
            Similarly, choosing R to be the time average of r between successive perihelia P and P′ and using r2dϕdτ=j gives R=∫P′Pr dτ/∫P′Pdτ=∫2π0dϕ[u0(1+e cos ϕ)]3/∫2π0dϕ[u0(1+e cos ϕ)]2=a(1+12e2), thus also leading to an incorrect prediction