Quantum Depth in the Random Oracle Model
Oct 12, 2022
Citations per year
Abstract: (Association for Computing Machinery)
We give a comprehensive characterisation of the computational power of shallow quantum circuits combined with classical computation. Specifically, for classes of search problems, we show that the following statements hold, relative to a random oracle: (a) BPP ≠ BQP. This refutes Jozsa’s conjecture in the random oracle model. As a result, this gives the first instantiatable separation between the classes by replacing the oracle with a cryptographic hash function, yielding a resolution to one of Aaronson’s ten semi-grand challenges in quantum computing. (b) BPP ⊈ QNC and QNC ⊈ BPP. This shows that there is a subtle interplay between classical computation and shallow quantum computation. In fact, for the second separation, we establish that, for some problems, the ability to perform adaptive measurements in a single shallow quantum circuit, is more useful than the ability to perform polynomially many shallow quantum circuits without adaptive measurements. We also show that BPP and BPP are both strictly contained in BPP. (c) There exists a 2-message proof of quantum depth protocol. Such a protocol allows a classical verifier to efficiently certify that a prover must be performing a computation of some minimum quantum depth. Our proof of quantum depth can be instantiated using the recent proof of quantumness construction by Yamakawa and Zhandry.Note:
- 113 pages (+ 9 page Appendix), 10 figures
- computer: quantum
- quantum circuit
- resolution
- quantum simulation
- quantum random oracle model
References(51)
Figures(21)
- [AA09]
- [AA15]
- [AGS22]
- [quant-ph]
- [AHU19]
- [AIK06]
- [AS04]
- [Aar05]
- [Aar10]
- [Aar13]
- [Ajt96]
- [BBBF18]
- [BBD+09]
- [BGJ+16]
- [BGK18]
- [BKVV20]
- [BKVV20]
- [BLZ21]
- [cs]
- [CCD+03]
- [CCL20]
- [CDGS18]
- [CGLQ20]
- [CGLQ20]
- [CGLQ20]