Analysing QBER and secure key rate under various losses for satellite based free space QKD

Muskan; Meena, Ramniwas; Banerjee, Subhashish

Analysing QBER and secure key rate under various losses for satellite based free space QKD

Aug 2, 2023

21 pages

e-Print:

2308.01036 [quant-ph]

View in:

ADS Abstract Service

pdf

reference search2 citations

Citations per year

Abstract: (arXiv)

Quantum Key Distribution is a key distribution method that uses the qubits to safely distribute one-time use encryption keys between two or more authorised participants in a way that ensures the identification of any eavesdropper. In this paper, we have done a comparison between the BB84 and B92 protocols and BBM92 and E91 entanglement based protocols for satellite based uplink and downlink in low Earth orbit. The expressions for the quantum bit error rate and the keyrate are given for all four protocols. The results indicate that, when compared to the B92 protocol, the BB84 protocol guarantees the distribution of a higher secure keyrate for a specific distance. Similarly, it is observed that BBM92 ensures higher keyrate in comparison with E91 protocol.

Note:

arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1906.08115 by other authors

quantum key distribution
satellite
entanglement
qubit
orbit
security

References(55)

Figures(11)

[1]

Anirban Pathak. Elements of quantum computation and quantum communication. CRC Press Boca Raton,, Chapter-8

[2]

Arockia Bazil Raj, Vishal Sharma, and Subhashish Banerjee. Principle and applications of free space optical communication. IET, UK

[3]

Dagmar Bruss, Gábor Erdélyi, Tim Meyer, Tobias Riege, and Jörg Rothe. Quantum cryptography: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 39(2):6-es

[4]

Advances in quantum cryptography

S. Pirandola
(
- York U., England and
- MIT
)
,
U.L. Andersen
(
- Denmark, Tech. U.
)
,
L. Banchi
(
- Florence U.
)
,
M. Berta
(
- Imperial Coll., London
)
,
D. Bunandar
(
- MIT
)

et al.

- Adv.Opt.Photon. 12 (2020) 4, 1012-1236
•
e-Print:
- 1906.01645
•
DOI:
- 10.1364/AOP.361502

[5]

Quantum cryptography

- Rev.Mod.Phys. 74 (2002) 145-195
•
e-Print:
- quant-ph/0101098
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.145

[6]

A single quantum cannot be cloned

W.K. Wootters
(
- Texas U. and
- Caltech
)
,
W.H. Zurek
(
- Texas U. and
- Caltech
)

- Nature 299 (1982) 802-803
•
DOI:
- 10.1038/299802a0

[7]

Subhashish Banerjee, and Anirban Pathak. The quantum cryptographic switch

N. Srinatha
,
S. Omkar
,
R. Srikanth

- Quant.Inf.Proc. 13 (2014) 59-70

[8]

Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing

- Theor.Comput.Sci. 560 (2014) 7-11
•
e-Print:
- 2003.06557
•
DOI:
- 10.1016/j.tcs.2014.05.025

[9]

Experimental quantum cryptography

Charles H. Bennett
(
- IBM Watson Res. Ctr.
)
,
François Bessette
(
- U. Montreal (main)
)
,
Gilles Brassard
(
- U. Montreal (main)
)
,
Louis Salvail
(
- U. Montreal (main)
)
,
John Smolin
(
- UCLA
)

- J.Cryptolog. 5 (1992) 1, 3-28
•
DOI:
- 10.1007/BF00191318

[23]

Practical free space quantum key distribution over 1-km

et al.

- Phys.Rev.Lett. 81 (1998) 3283-3286
•
e-Print:
- quant-ph/9805071
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3283

[11]

Security of quantum key distribution with entangled photons against individual attacks

- Phys.Rev.A 65 (2002) 5, 052310
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.052310

[12]

Experimental Demonstration of Free-Space Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution over 144 km

Tobias Schmitt-Manderbach
(
- Munich, Max Planck Inst. Quantenopt. and
- Munich U.
)
,
Henning Weier
(
- Munich U.
)
,
Martin Fürst
(
- Munich U.
)
,
Rupert Ursin
(
- Vienna U.
)
,
Felix Tiefenbacher
(
- Vienna U. and
- IQOQI, Vienna
)

et al.

- Phys.Rev.Lett. 98 (2007) 1, 010504
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.010504

[13]

Kishore Thapliyal, Anirban Pathak, and Subhashish Banerjee. Quantum cryptography over nonmarkovian channels

- Quant.Inf.Proc. 16 (2017) 1-21

[14]

Any Quantum Network is Structurally Controllable by a Single Driving Signal

Michael Siomau

- Quant.Inf.Proc. 18 (2019) 1
•
e-Print:
- 1703.10236
•
DOI:
- 10.1007/s11128-018-2112-6

[15]

and David Roger Wisely. Opportunities and challenges for optical wireless: the competitive advantage of free space telecommunications links in today’s crowded marketplace. Wireless Technologies and Systems: Millimeter-Wave and Optical, 3232:119-128

Theresa H. Carbonneau

[16]

Experimental quantum cryptography

Charles H. Bennett

[17]

Hugo Zbinden, Nicolas Gisin, Bruno Huttner, Antoine Muller, and Wolfgang Tittel. Practical aspects of quantum cryptographic key distribution

- J.Cryptolog. 13 (2000) 207-220

[18]

PCM Owens, JG Rarity

D. PR Tapster

- Appl.Opt. 33 (1994) 6895-6901

[19]

Ursin, et al

Kevin J. Resch
,
M. Lindenthal
,
B. Blauensteiner
,
HR Böhm
,
A. Fedrizzi

et al.

- Opt.Express 13 (2005) 202-209

[20]

Dominic Mayers. Unconditional security in quantum cryptography. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 48(3):351-406

[21]

Andrew Shields and Zhiliang Yuan. Key to the quantum industry

- Phys.World 20 (2007) 24

[22]

Quantum cryptography: An emerging technology in network security. In

Mehrdad S. Sharbaf

[22]

International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST), pages 13-19

Mehrdad S. Sharbaf

[23]

Practical free space quantum key distribution over 1-km

et al.

- Phys.Rev.Lett. 81 (1998) 3283-3286
•
e-Print:
- quant-ph/9805071
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3283

[24]

Vishal Sharma, Chitra Shukla, Subhashish Banerjee, and Anirban Pathak. Controlled bidirectional remote state preparation in noisy environment: a generalized view

- Quant.Inf.Proc. 14 (2015) 3441-3464

1-25 of 55
1
2
3
25 / page