Earthquakes as probing tools for gravity theories
Aug 3, 2023Citations per year
Abstract: (arXiv)
We propose a novel method for testing gravity models using seismic data from Earth. By imposing observational constraints on Earth's moment of inertia and mass, we rigorously limit the gravitational models' parameters within a 2σ accuracy. Our method constrains the parameters governing additional terms to the General Relativity Lagrangian to the following ranges: −2×109≲β≲109m2 for Palatini f(R) gravity, −8×109≲ϵ≲4×109m2 for Eddington-inspired Born-Infeld gravity, and −10−3≲Υ≲10−3 for Degenerate Higher-Order Scalar-Tensor theories. We also discuss potential avenues to enhance the proposed method, aiming to impose even tighter constraints on gravity models.Note:
- 6 pages, 3 figures
References(58)
Figures(5)
- [1]
- ,
- •
- Phys.Rev.D 60 (1999) 081301
- e-Print:•
- [2]Modified gravity and cosmology: an update by the CANTATA network
- Saridakis
- [3]
- •
- JCAP 07 (2016) 016
- e-Print:•
- [4]
- A. Delhom,
- G.J. Olmo,
- E. Orazi
- JHEP 11 149
- [4]Figure 3: [color online] 2σ confidence regions of the theory parameters (ρc, ρm, ∆ρ) for different values of the β parameter, being of
- A. Delhom,
- G.J. Olmo,
- E. Orazi
- Order 1010 m2
- [4]the range of the central density values, together with the corresponding colors, is shown in the color bar below the figures. The units are kg/m3. The red dashed lines represent the PREM values of the density jump and the density at the base of the mantle. The grey region corresponds to the maximum uncertainty in the determination of the density at the base of the mantle ρm, which was assumed to be 50 kg m-3 (with respect to the PREM value)
- A. Delhom,
- G.J. Olmo,
- E. Orazi
- [5]
- E. Babichev,
- C. Deffayet
- Class.Quant.Grav. 30 (2013) 18
- [6]
- •
- Phys.Rev.D 91 (2015) 124066
- e-Print:•
- [7]
- ,
- ,
- •
- Astrophys.J. 802 (2015) 63
- e-Print:•
- [8]
- •
- Phys.Rev.D 104 (2021) 8, 084097
- e-Print:•
- [9]
- •
- Phys.Rev.D 108 (2023) 4, 044055
- e-Print:•
- [10]
- •
- Astrophys.J.Lett. 887 (2019) 1, L1
- e-Print:•
- [11]
- •
- Phys.Rev.Lett. 123 (2019) 9, 091103
- e-Print:•
- [12]
- •
- Astron.Astrophys. 667 (2022) A115
- e-Print:•
- [13]
- [14]
- Barbara Patricelli(,)
- Pisa U. and
- EGO, Pisa and
- INFN, Pisa and
- Rome Observ.
- ,
- ,
- ,
- •
- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 513 (2022) 3, 4159-4168,
- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 514 (2022) 3, 3395 (erratum)
- e-Print:•
- [15]
- ,
- ,
- ,
- ,
- •
- Phys.Rev.Lett. 119 (2017) 25, 251301
- e-Print:•
- [16]
- ,
- •
- Phys.Rev.Lett. 119 (2017) 25, 251304
- e-Print:•
- [17]
- ,
- ,
- •
- Astrophys.J.Lett. 852 (2018) 2, L25
- e-Print:•
- [18]
- •
- Astrophys.J. 832 (2016) 2, 167
- e-Print:•
- [19]Collaboration•
- •
- Nature Astron. 4 (2019) 1, 72-76
- e-Print:•
- [20]
- ,
- ,
- •
- Phys.Rept. 876 (2020) 1-75
- e-Print:•
- [21]024016
- A. Kozak,
- K. Soieva,
- A. Wojnar
- Phys.Rev.D 108 (2023) 2
- [22]
- •
- Eur.Phys.J.C 83 (2023) 1, 6
- e-Print:•
- [23]
- •
- Phys.Rev.D 107 (2023) 4, 044025
- e-Print:•