Tight Lieb–Robinson Bound for approximation ratio in quantum annealing - INSPIRE

DataBETA

Tight Lieb–Robinson Bound for approximation ratio in quantum annealing

Arthur Braida
(
- Unlisted, FR and
- LPC2E, Orleans
)
,
Simon Martiel
(
- Unlisted, FR
)
,
Ioan Todinca
(
- LPC2E, Orleans
)

Nov 21, 2023

21 pages

Published in:

npj Quantum Inf. 10 (2024) 1, 40

Published: Apr 17, 2024

e-Print:

2311.12732 [quant-ph]

DOI:

10.1038/s41534-024-00832-x

View in:

ADS Abstract Service

reference search5 citations

Citations per year

Abstract: (Springer)

Quantum annealing (QA) holds promise for optimization problems in quantum computing, especially for combinatorial optimization. This analog framework attracts attention for its potential to address complex problems. Its gate-based homologous, QAOA with proven performance, has attracted a lot of attention to the NISQ era. Several numerical benchmarks try to compare these two metaheuristics, however, classical computational power highly limits the performance insights. In this work, we introduce a parametrized version of QA enabling a precise 1-local analysis of the algorithm. We develop a tight Lieb–Robinson bound for regular graphs, achieving the best-known numerical value to analyze QA locally. Studying MaxCut over cubic graph as a benchmark optimization problem, we show that a linear-schedule QA with a 1-local analysis achieves an approximation ratio over 0.7020, outperforming any known 1-local algorithms.

References(24)

Figures(10)

[1]

Quantum stochastic optimization

- Stoch.Proc.Appl. 33 (1989) 2, 233-244
•
DOI:
- 10.1016/0304-4149(89)90040-9

[2]

Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model

- Phys.Rev.E 58 (1998) 5, 5355,
- Phys.Rev.E 58 (1998) 5355
•
e-Print:
- cond-mat/9804280
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.5355

[3]

Effectiveness of quantum annealing for continuous-variable optimization

Shunta Arai
(
- Tokyo Inst. Tech.
)
,
Hiroki Oshiyama
(
- Tohoku U.
)
,
Hidetoshi Nishimori
(
- Tokyo Inst. Tech. and
- Tokyo U. and
- Wako, RIKEN and
- Tohoku U.
)

- Phys.Rev.A 108 (2023) 4, 042403
•
e-Print:
- 2305.06631
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.108.042403

[4]

Quantum annealing for industry applications: introduction and review

- Rept.Prog.Phys. 85 (2022) 10, 104001
•
e-Print:
- 2112.07491
•
DOI:
- 10.1088/1361-6633/ac8c54

Quantum Computation by Adiabatic Evolution

Edward Farhi
(
- MIT, Cambridge, CTP
)
,
Jeffrey Goldstone
(
- MIT, Cambridge, CTP
)
,
Sam Gutmann
(
- Northeastern U., Math. Dept.
)
,
Michael Sipser
(
- MIT
)

e-Print:
- quant-ph/0001106

[6]

Adiabatic quantum computation

Tameem Albash
(
- CIT-USC
)
,
Daniel A. Lidar
(
- Southern California U.
)

- Rev.Mod.Phys. 90 (2018) 1, 015002
•
e-Print:
- 1611.04471
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015002

A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

Edward Farhi
(
- MIT, Cambridge, CTP
)
,
Jeffrey Goldstone
(
- MIT, Cambridge, CTP
)
,
Sam Gutmann
(
- MIT, Cambridge, CTP
)

e-Print:
- 1411.4028

[8]

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model at Infinite Size

Edward Farhi
(
- Google Inc. and
- MIT
)
,
Jeffrey Goldstone
(
- MIT
)
,
Sam Gutmann
(
- Google Inc. and
- Harvard U.
)
,
Leo Zhou
(
- Google Inc. and
- Harvard U.
)

- Quantum 6 (2022) 759,
- Quantum 6 (2022) 759
•
e-Print:
- 1910.08187
•
DOI:
- 10.22331/q-2022-07-07-759

Multi-angle quantum approximate optimization algorithm

Rebekah Herrman
(
- U. Tennessee, Knoxville
)
,
Phillip C. Lotshaw
(
- Oak Ridge
)
,
James Ostrowski
(
- U. Tennessee, Knoxville
)
,
Travis S. Humble
(
- Oak Ridge
)
,
George Siopsis
(
- Tennessee U.
)

- Sci.Rep. 12 (2022) 1, 6781
•
DOI:
- 10.1038/s41598-022-10555-8

[10]

Evaluating quantum approximate optimization algorithm: A case study. Intenth international green and sustainable computing conference (IGSC), 1-6

R. Shaydulin
,
Y. Alexeev

Sampling frequency thresholds for the quantum advantage of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm

Danylo Lykov
(
- Argonne and
- U. Chicago (main)
)
,
Jonathan Wurtz
(
- Tufts U. and
- Unlisted, US, MA
)
,
Cody Poole
(
- Wisconsin U., Madison
)
,
Mark Saffman
(
- Wisconsin U., Madison and
- Unlisted, US
)
,
Tom Noel
(
- Unlisted, US, CO
)

et al.

- npj Quantum Inf. 9 (2023) 1, 73
•
e-Print:
- 2206.03579
•
DOI:
- 10.1038/s41534-023-00718-4

[12]

Quantum annealing vs. qaoa: 127 qubit higher-order ising problems on nisq computers. In International Conference on High Performance

E. Pelofske
,
A. Bärtschi
,
S. Eidenbenz

- Computing 240 (2023) 258

A review on Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and its variants

Kostas Blekos
(
- Patras U.
)
,
Dean Brand
(
- Stellenbosch U.
)
,
Andrea Ceschini
(
- Rome U.
)
,
Chiao-Hui Chou
(
- Taiwan, Natl. Normal U.
)
,
Rui-Hao Li
(
- Case Western Reserve U.
)

et al.

- Phys.Rept. 1068 (2024) 1-66
•
e-Print:
- 2306.09198
•
DOI:
- 10.1016/j.physrep.2024.03.002

Lower Bounds on Number of QAOA Rounds Required for Guaranteed Approximation Ratios

Naphan Benchasattabuse
(
- Los Alamos and
- Keio U.
)
,
Andreas Bärtschi
(
- Los Alamos
)
,
Luis Pedro García-Pintos
(
- Los Alamos
)
,
John Golden
(
- Los Alamos
)
,
Nathan Lemons
(
- Los Alamos
)

et al.

e-Print:
- 2308.15442

[15]

On constant-time quantum annealing and guaranteed approximations for graph optimization problems

- Quantum Sci.Technol. 7 (2022) 4, 045030
•
e-Print:
- 2202.01636
•
DOI:
- 10.1088/2058-9565/ac8e91

[16]

Rapid quantum approaches for combinatorial optimisation inspired by optimal state-transfer

- Quantum 8 (2024) 1253,
- Quantum 8 (2024) 1253
•
e-Print:
- 2301.06846
•
DOI:
- 10.22331/q-2024-02-13-1253

[17]

Classical and quantum bounded depth approximation algorithms

Matthew B. Hastings
(
- UC, Santa Barbara (main)
)

- Quant.Inf.Comput. 19 (2019) 13-14, 1116-1140
•
e-Print:
- 1905.07047
•
DOI:
- 10.26421/QIC19.13-14-3

[18]

The finite group velocity of quantum spin systems

E.H. Lieb
(
- MIT, LNS
)
,
D.W. Robinson
(
- Provence U.
)

- Commun.Math.Phys. 28 (1972) 251-257
•
DOI:
- 10.1007/BF01645779

[19]

Speed limits and locality in many-body quantum dynamics

- Rept.Prog.Phys. 86 (2023) 11, 116001,
- Rept.Prog.Phys. 86 (2023) 116001
•
e-Print:
- 2303.07386
•
DOI:
- 10.1088/1361-6633/acfaae

[20]

Tightening the Lieb-Robinson Bound in Locally Interacting Systems

- PRX Quantum 1 (2020) 1, 010303,
- PRX Quantum 1 (2020) 010303
•
e-Print:
- 1908.03997
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PRXQuantum.1.010303

[21]

Quantum Algorithm for Simulating Real Time Evolution of Lattice Hamiltonians

Jeongwan Haah
(
- Microsoft, Redmond
)
,
Matthew B. Hastings
(
- Station Q, UCSB and
- Microsoft, Redmond
)
,
Robin Kothari
(
- Microsoft, Redmond
)
,
Guang Hao Low
(
- Microsoft, Redmond
)

- SIAM J.Comput. 52 (2021) 6, FOCS18-250-FOCS18-284,
- SIAM J. Comput. SPECIAL SECTION FOCS 2018
•
e-Print:
- 1801.03922
•
DOI:
- 10.1137/18M1231511

[22]

An application of combinatorial optimization to statistical physics and circuit layout design

F. Barahona
,
M. Grötschel
,
M. Jünger
,
G. Reinelt

- Oper. Res. 36 (1988) 493
•
DOI:
- 10.1287/opre.36.3.493

[23]

Lieb-Robinson Bounds and the Generation of Correlations and Topological Quantum Order

S. Bravyi
(
- IBM Watson Res. Ctr.
)
,
M.B. Hastings
(
- LANL, Ctr. for Nonlinear Studies and
- Los Alamos
)
,
F. Verstraete
(
- Caltech, IQI
)

- Phys.Rev.Lett. 97 (2006) 050401
•
e-Print:
- quant-ph/0603121
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.050401

[24]

Max cut in cubic graphs

E. Halperin
,
D. Livnat
,
U. Zwick

- J.Algorithms 53 (2004) 169-185
•
DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jalgor.2004.06.001