Reply to the "Comments to the paper "Detailed study of the astrophysical direct capture reaction $^{6}{\rm Li}(p, \gamma)^{7}{\rm Be}$ in ..." " by S.B. Dubovichenko, A.S. Tkachenko, R. Ya. Kezerashvili, arXiv:2401.04281 (2024)

Tursunov, E.M.; Turakulov, S.A.; Tursunmakhatov, K.I.

Reply to the "Comments to the paper "Detailed study of the astrophysical direct capture reaction $^{6}{\rm Li}(p, \gamma)^{7}{\rm Be}$ in ..." " by S.B. Dubovichenko, A.S. Tkachenko, R. Ya. Kezerashvili, arXiv:2401.04281 (2024)

Feb 8, 2024

3 pages

e-Print:

2402.06687 [nucl-th]

View in:

ADS Abstract Service

pdf

reference search0 citations

Citations per year

0 Citations

Abstract: (arXiv)

The differences in potential models used in our work and in the original paper of the authors of the Comment are discussed. The neglecting of simple rules of reaction calculations is shown as a possible origin of the defect in the temperature dependence of the reaction rates in the work of the authors of the Comment.

Note:

3 pages

References(6)

Figures(0)

[1]

Detailed study of the astrophysical direct capture reaction ${}^{6}{Li} (p, γ) {}^{7}{Be}$ in a potential model approach

- Phys.Rev.C 108 (2023) 6, 065801
•
e-Print:
- 2306.12838
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.065801

[2]

Local potential models for the scattering of complex nuclei

- Nucl.Phys.A 275 (1977) 246-268
•
DOI:
- 10.1016/0375-9474(77)90287-1

[3]

${}^{6}{Li} (p, γ) {}^{7}{Be}$ reaction rate in the light of the new data of the Laboratory for Underground Nuclear Astrophysics

- Phys.Rev.C 105 (2022) 6, 065806
•
e-Print:
- 2201.07987
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.065806

[4]

Underground experimental study finds no evidence of low-energy resonance in the $^{6}$ Li(p,γ) $^{7}$ Be reaction

et al.

- Phys.Rev.C 102 (2020) 5, 052802
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.052802

[5]

Differential cross section and analyzing power for elastic scattering of protons on 6 Li below 2.2 MeV

et al.

- Nucl.Phys.A 581 (1995) 93-106
•
DOI:
- 10.1016/0375-9474(94)00422-J

[6]

Indirect determination of the astrophysical S factor for the Li6(p,γ)Be7 reaction using the asymptotic normalization coefficient method

et al.

- Phys.Rev.C 104 (2021) 1, 015807
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.015807

Reply to the "Comments to the paper "Detailed study of the astrophysical direct capture reaction 6Li(p,γ)7Be^{6}{\rm Li}(p, \gamma)^{7}{\rm Be}6Li(p,γ)7Be in ..." " by S.B. Dubovichenko, A.S. Tkachenko, R. Ya. Kezerashvili, arXiv:2401.04281 (2024)

Citations per year

Detailed study of the astrophysical direct capture reaction Li6(p,γ)Be7 in a potential model approach

Local potential models for the scattering of complex nuclei

Li6(p,γ)Be7 reaction rate in the light of the new data of the Laboratory for Underground Nuclear Astrophysics

Underground experimental study finds no evidence of low-energy resonance in the 6^{6}6Li(p,γ)7^{7}7Be reaction

Differential cross section and analyzing power for elastic scattering of protons on 6 Li below 2.2 MeV

Indirect determination of the astrophysical S factor for the Li6(p,γ)Be7 reaction using the asymptotic normalization coefficient method

Reply to the "Comments to the paper "Detailed study of the astrophysical direct capture reaction $^{6}{\rm Li}(p, \gamma)^{7}{\rm Be}$ in ..." " by S.B. Dubovichenko, A.S. Tkachenko, R. Ya. Kezerashvili, arXiv:2401.04281 (2024)

Detailed study of the astrophysical direct capture reaction ${}^{6}{Li} (p, γ) {}^{7}{Be}$ in a potential model approach

${}^{6}{Li} (p, γ) {}^{7}{Be}$ reaction rate in the light of the new data of the Laboratory for Underground Nuclear Astrophysics

Underground experimental study finds no evidence of low-energy resonance in the $^{6}$ Li(p,γ) $^{7}$ Be reaction