literature
Literature
Authors
Jobs
Seminars
Conferences
DataBETA

A clear case for dust obscuration of the lunar retroreflectors

Mar 1, 2024
Published in:
  • Icarus 417 (2024) 116113
  • Published: May 1, 2024
e-Print:
DOI:
View in:
pdf
reference search0 citations

Citations per year

0 Citations
Abstract: (Elsevier Inc.)
The passive retroreflector arrays placed on the moon by Apollo 11, 14 and 15 astronauts continue to produce valuable Earth–Moon range measurements that enable high-precision tests of gravitational physics, as well as studies of geo- and selenophysics. The optical throughput of these retroreflectors has declined since their deployment, with an additional signal loss at full moon when the reflectors experience direct solar illumination. We show that the loss in return rate can be attributed to the accumulation of a thin layer of lunar dust on the surfaces of the corner cube retroreflectors. First, a careful analysis of the optical link budget for the Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation (APOLLO) experiment reveals that the lunar return rate is 15–20 times smaller than predicted, a deficit that can be explained by a reflector dust covering fraction of ∼50%. Second, range measurements taken during a lunar eclipse indicate that the solar illumination of the retroreflectors degrades their throughput by an additional factor of ∼15. Finally, a numerical simulation of heat transfer in dust-coated reflectors is able to model the resulting thermal lensing effect, in which thermal gradients in the retroreflectors degrade their far-field diffraction pattern. A comparison of this simulation to eclipse measurements finds a dust coverage fraction of ∼50%. Taken together, the link analysis, eclipse observations and thermal modeling support the claim that the retroreflectors are obscured by lunar dust, with both link budget and simulation independently finding the dust fraction to be ∼50%. •APOLLO regularly observes a decreased return rate during full moon.•This improves by a factor of 15 during a lunar eclipse, confirmed by observations.•APOLLO’s link budget shows the observed rate is 15–20 times smaller than predicted.•We find that a dust obscuration factor of 50% best explains the observed deficit.
  • Eclipses
  • Moon, surface
  • Regoliths