Information disturbance tradeoff in bidirectional QKD - INSPIRE

Information disturbance tradeoff in bidirectional QKD

Mar 28, 2024

12 pages

Published in:

Phys.Scripta 99 (2024) 10, 105135

Published: Sep 30, 2024

e-Print:

2403.19156 [quant-ph]

DOI:

10.1088/1402-4896/ad7912

View in:

ADS Abstract Service

reference search0 citations

Citations per year

0 Citations

Abstract: (IOP)

Making use of the Quantum Network formalism of Phys. Rev. A, 82 (2010) 062 305, we present the case for quantum networks with finite outcomes, more specifically one which could distinguish only between specific unitary operators in a given basis for operators. Despite its simplicity, we proceed to build a network derived from the optimal strategy in Phys. Rev. A, 82 (2010) 062 305 and show that the information-disturbance tradeoff in distinguishing between two operators acting on qubits, selected from mutually unbiased unitary bases is equal to the case of estimating an operator selected randomly from the set of SU(2) based on the Haar measure. This suggests that such strategies in distinguishing between mutually unbiased operators is not any easier than estimating an operator derived from an infinite set. We then show how this network can be used as a natural attack strategy against a bidirectional quantum cryptographic protocol.

Note:

12 pages and 6 figures

quantum networks
bidirectional QKD
MUUB

References(32)

Figures(6)

DOI:
- 10.1002/prop.200310045

[2]

Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA

J. Schwinger

[3]

W. Alltop

- IEEE Trans.Info.Theor. 26 (1980) 350-354
•
DOI:
- 10.1109/TIT.1980.1056185

[4]

Geometrical description of quantal state determination

I.D. Ivonovic

- J.Phys.A 14 (1981) 12, 3241
•
DOI:
- 10.1088/0305-4470/14/12/019

[5]

Optimal state-determination by mutually unbiased measurements

- Annals Phys. 191 (1989) 2, 363-381
•
DOI:
- 10.1016/0003-4916(89)90322-9

[6]

A New Proof for the Existence of Mutually Unbiased Bases

- Algorithmica 34 (2002) 4, 512-528
•
DOI:
- 10.1007/s00453-002-0980-7

[7]

T. Durt
,
B. Englert
,
I. Bengtsson
,
K. Życzkowski

- Int.J.Quant.Inf. 8 (2010) 535-640
•
DOI:
- 10.1142/S0219749910006502

[8]

Security of Quantum Key Distribution Using $d$ -Level Systems

Nicolas J. Cerf
(
- Brussels U. and
- Caltech, JPL
)
,
Mohamed Bourennane
(
- Royal Inst. Tech., Kista
)
,
Anders Karlsson
(
- Royal Inst. Tech., Kista
)
,
Nicolas Gisin
(
- Geneva U.
)

- Phys.Rev.Lett. 88 (2002) 12, 127902
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.127902

[9]

Proceedings Of IEEE International Conference On Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing

C. Bennett
,
G. Brassard

[10]

Quantum cryptography

- Rev.Mod.Phys. 74 (2002) 145-195
•
e-Print:
- quant-ph/0101098
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.145

[11]

Advances in quantum cryptography

S. Pirandola
(
- York U., England and
- MIT
)
,
U.L. Andersen
(
- Denmark, Tech. U.
)
,
L. Banchi
(
- Florence U.
)
,
M. Berta
(
- Imperial Coll., London
)
,
D. Bunandar
(
- MIT
)

et al.

- Adv.Opt.Photon. 12 (2020) 4, 1012-1236
•
e-Print:
- 1906.01645
•
DOI:
- 10.1364/AOP.361502

[12]

Deterministic Secure Direct Communication Using Entanglement

Kim Boström
(
- Potsdam U.
)
,
Timo Felbinger
(
- Potsdam U.
)

- Phys.Rev.Lett. 89 (2002) 18, 187902
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.187902

[13]

C. Qing-Yu
,
L. Bai-Wen

- Chin.Phys.Lett. 21 (2004) 601
•
DOI:
- 10.1088/0256-307X/21/4/003

[14]

Secure direct communication with a quantum one-time pad

Fu-Guo Deng
(
- Tsinghua U., Beijing and
- Baidu, IQC, Beijing
)
,
Gui Lu Long
(
- Tsinghua U., Beijing and
- Baidu, IQC, Beijing and
- IRFU, Saclay
)

- Phys.Rev.A 69 (2004) 5, 052319
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.052319

[15]

F. Deng
,
G. Long

- Phys.Rev.A 70 (2004) 012311
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.012311

[16]

Secure Deterministic Communication without Entanglement

- Phys.Rev.Lett. 94 (2005) 14, 140501
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.140501

[17]

G. Chiribella
,
G. D'Ariano
,
P. Perinotti

- Phys.Rev.Lett. 101 (2008) 180504
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.180504

[18]

A. Bisio
,
G. Chiribella
,
G. D'Ariano
,
P. Perinotti

- Phys.Rev.A 82 (2010) 062305
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.062305

[19]

Optimizing quantum process tomography with unitary 2-designs

A.J. Scott

- J.Phys.A 41 (2008) 5, 055308
•
DOI:
- 10.1088/1751-8113/41/5/055308

[20]

J. Shaari
,
S. Soekardjo

- EPL 120 (2018) 60001
•
DOI:
- 10.1209/0295-5075/120/60001

[21]

Y. Tao
,
H. Nan
,
J. Zhang
,
S. Fei

- Quantum Info. Process. 14 (2015) 2291
•
DOI:
- 10.1007/s11128-015-0980-6

[22]

J. Liu
,
M. Yang
,
K. Feng

- Quantum Info. Process. 16 (2017) 159
•
DOI:
- 10.1007/s11128-017-1608-9

[23]

D. Xu

- Quantum Info. Process. 16 (2017) 65
•
DOI:
- 10.1007/s11128-017-1534-x

[24]

A. Bisio
,
G. Chiribella
,
G. D'Ariano
,
P. Perinotti

- Acta Phys.Slov. 61 (2011) 273-390
•
DOI:
- 10.2478/v10155-011-0003-9

[25]

J. Shaari
,
R. Nasir
,
S. Mancini

- Phys.Rev.A 94 (2016) 052328
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.052328

1-25 of 32
1
2
25 / page