Joint modelling of astrophysical systematics for cosmology with LSST cosmic shear

We present a novel framework for jointly modelling the weak lensing source galaxy redshift distribution and the intrinsic alignment (IA) of galaxies through a shared luminosity function (LF). In the context of a Rubin Observatory’s Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Year 1 and Year 10 cosmic shear analysis, we show that our novel approach produces cosmological parameter constraints which are comparable to standard methods, while offering more physical insight into IA and selection effects. We clarify the relationship between individual parameters of a Schechter LF and the redshift distribution of a magnitude-limited sample, showing the consequences of marginalizing over these parameters when modelling IAs in standard cosmic shear analyses. We explore the impact of the shape of the LF on the cosmic shear data vector, and we outline the potential of this method to naturally model selection functions in redshift distribution estimation. Although this work focuses on LSST cosmic shear, the proposed joint modelling framework is broadly applicable to weak lensing surveys.

Note:

19 pages, 16 figures, 3 tables; v3: updated to match the published version

gravitational lensing: weak
cosmological parameters

References(250)

Figures(0)

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing

DES

Collaboration

•

T.M.C. Abbott
(
- Cerro-Tololo InterAmerican Obs.
)

et al.

- Phys.Rev.D 105 (2022) 2, 023520
•
e-Print:
- 2105.13549
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.023520

Third data release of the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program

et al.

- Publ.Astron.Soc.Jap. 74 (2022) 2, 247-272-272
•
e-Print:
- 2108.13045
•
DOI:
- 10.1093/pasj/psab122

Effective field theory of intrinsic alignments at one loop order: a comparison to dark matter simulations

- JCAP 10 (2023) 005
•
e-Print:
- 2303.15565
•
DOI:
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2023/10/005

Fisher Matrix Preloaded -- Fisher4Cast

- Int.J.Mod.Phys.D 20 (2011) 2559-2598
•
e-Print:
- 0906.0993
•
DOI:
- 10.1142/S0218271811020548

2025021015242937300_bib5

Bhandari

Bright galaxy sample in the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 4 - Selection, photometric redshifts, and physical properties

et al.

- Astron.Astrophys. 653 (2021) A82
•
e-Print:
- 2101.06010
•
DOI:
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202140352

Euclid preparation. VII. Forecast validation for Euclid cosmological probes

Euclid

Collaboration

•

A. Blanchard
(
- IRAP, Toulouse
)

et al.

- Astron.Astrophys. 642 (2020) A191
•
e-Print:
- 1910.09273
•
DOI:
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202038071

Testing the tidal alignment model of galaxy intrinsic alignment

- JCAP 05 (2011) 010
•
e-Print:
- 1101.4017
•
DOI:
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/05/010

Tidal alignment of galaxies

Jonathan Blazek
(
- Ohio State U., CCAPP
)
,
Zvonimir Vlah
(
- SLAC and
- KIPAC, Menlo Park and
- Stanford U., ITP and
- Stanford U., Phys. Dept.
)
,
Uroš Seljak
(
- LBNL, Berkeley and
- UC, Berkeley
)

- JCAP 08 (2015) 015
•
e-Print:
- 1504.02510
•
DOI:
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/08/015

Beyond linear galaxy alignments

- Phys.Rev.D 100 (2019) 10, 103506
•
e-Print:
- 1708.09247
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.103506

Euclid: Forecasts from the void-lensing cross-correlation

Euclid

Collaboration

•

M. Bonici
(
- Genoa U. and
- IASF, Milan
)

et al.

- Astron.Astrophys. 670 (2023) A47,
- Astron.Astrophys. 670 (2023) A47
•
e-Print:
- 2206.14211
•
DOI:
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202244445

Dark energy constraints from cosmic shear power spectra: impact of intrinsic alignments on photometric redshift requirements

- New J.Phys. 9 (2007) 444
•
e-Print:
- 0705.0166
•
DOI:
- 10.1088/1367-2630/9/12/444

2025021015242937300_bib13

Brodtkorb

SKA weak lensing – III. Added value of multiwavelength synergies for the mitigation of systematics

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 464 (2017) 4, 4747-4760,
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2017, vol. 464, issue 4, pp. 4747-4760
•
e-Print:
- 1606.03451
•
DOI:
- 10.1093/mnras/stw2688