Interpreting CMB anisotropy observations: Trying to tell the truth with statistics
May, 20016 pages
Part of Relativistic astrophysics. Proceedings, 20th Texas Symposium, Austin, USA, December 10-15, 2000, 202-207
Published in:
- AIP Conf.Proc. 586 (2001) 1, 202-207
Contribution to:
- Published: Feb 20, 2002
e-Print:
- astro-ph/0105010 [astro-ph]
DOI:
View in:
Citations per year
Abstract: (AIP)
A conflict has been reported between the baryon density inferred from deuterium observations and that found from recent CMB observations by BOOMERanG and MAXIMA. Despite the flurry of papers that attempt to resolve this conflict by adding new physics to the early universe, we will show that it can instead be resolved via a more careful usage of statistics. Indeed, the Bayesian analyses that produce this conflict are by their nature poorly suited for drawing this type of conclusion. A properly defined frequentist analysis can address this question directly and appears not to find a conflict. Finally, a conservative accounting of systematic uncertainties in measuring the deuterium abundance could reduce what is nominally a 3σ conflict to 1σ.Note:
- Published in Relativistic Astrophysics: Proceedings. Edited by J.C. Wheeler and H. Martel, N.y., AIP, 2001. p.202
References(17)
Figures(0)