A user-oriented comparison of the techniques for 3D spectroscopy

A comparison of the most popular techniques for 3D spectroscopy is presented in a way which should hopefully be useful for astronomers intending to use these techniques. Integral field spectroscopy, slitless spectroscopy, tunable imaging filters, imaging Fourier transform spectroscopy, and energy-resolving detectors are included in their different implementation. Their relative advantages and disadvantages are discussed in view of the possible scientific application.

References(7)

Figures(0)

The sauron project. I. the panoramic integral-field spectrograph

et al.

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 326 (2001) 23
•
e-Print:
- astro-ph/0103451
•
DOI:
- 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04612.x

- Proc.SPIE Int.Soc.Opt.Eng. 5492 242

Sinfoni - integral field spectroscopy at 50 milli-arcsecond resolution with the eso vlt

et al.

- Proc.SPIE Int.Soc.Opt.Eng. 4841 (2003) 1548-1561
•
e-Print:
- astro-ph/0306191
•
DOI:
- 10.1117/12.459468

Giraffe multiple integral field units at vlt: a unique tool to recover velocity fields of distant galaxies

- Astron.Astrophys. 420 (2004) L31-L34
•
e-Print:
- astro-ph/0405321
•
DOI:
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20040160

- Proc.SPIE Int.Soc.Opt.Eng. 4841 1670

- Nucl.Instrum.Meth.A 325 319

GRAPES, GRIsm spectroscopy of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Description and data reduction

et al.

- Astrophys.J.Suppl. 154 (2004) 501
•
e-Print:
- astro-ph/0403458
•
DOI:
- 10.1086/422582