Cosmology from Type Ia supernovae

This presentation reports on first evidence for a low-mass-density/positive-cosmological-constant universe that will expand forever, based on observations of a set of 40 high-redshift supernovae. The experimental strategy, data sets, and analysis techniques are described. More extensive analyses of these results with some additional methods and data are presented in the more recent LBNL report #41801 (Perlmutter et al., 1998: accepted for publication in Ap.J.), astro-ph/9812133 . This Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory reprint is a reduction of a poster presentation from the Cosmology Display Session #85 on 9 January 1998 at the American Astronomical Society meeting in Washington D.C. It is also available on the World Wide Web at http://supernova.LBL.gov/ This work has also been referenced in the literature by the pre-meeting abstract citation: Perlmutter et al., B.A.A.S., volume 29, page 1351 (1997).

Note:

Presented at the January 1998 Meeting of the AAS •
To be sure, the Maxwell construction could be generalized. But 'equal areas' would be replaced by 'equal volumes', and 'tangent slope' by 'tangent surface' in a space of n+1 dimensions, where n denotes the number of independent components

References(3)

Figures(0)

standard model

Ωm/2

[1]

2 3 -3 -2 2 3 No Big Bang flatclosed open 68% 90% 90% 68% recollapses eventually Cross-Checks We check our results for a variety of possible systematic errors, including Malmquist bias and host-galaxy extinction (see Ap.J. 1997 for a more extensive list and a discussion of techniques for cross-checking). By separating our supernovae into subsamples according to different parameters, we can test to see if that parameter is biasing our measurement. For example, to test for Malmquist bias, we plot the distribution of measurements of ΩM for the intrinsically brighter supernovae in our sample—those with broader stretched lightcurves—and compare it to the distribution found for the intrinsically fainter supernovae in our sample—those with narrow lightcurves. The two distributions are not significantly shifted from each other, indicating that Malmquist bias is not a statistically significant error for this sample. (We assign a

Perlmutter

0.2 systematic error as an upper bound for extinction bias. Note that the very reddest of supernovae of our sample do show evidence of extinction, as they fall on the faint (low ΩM side of the distribution), and are excluded in this study. Preliminary 10 0 Narrow stretch, fainter SNe Broad stretch, brighter SNe Check for Malmquist bias 0 5 ΩΜ (flat universe) 0-1-2-3 1 2 3 0 Redd ed SNe Bluer SNe Check for Host Galaxy Extinction

er SNe Very R

- Analysis 0 5