Questionable arguments for the correctness of perturbation theory in nonAbelian models
Feb, 19979 pages
Published in:
- Phys.Rev.D 57 (1998) 1394-1396
e-Print:
- hep-lat/9702008 [hep-lat]
Report number:
- MPI-PHT-97-008
View in:
Citations per year
Abstract:
We analyze the arguments put forward recently by Niedermayer et al in favor of the correctness of conventional perturbation theory in non-Abelian models and supposedly showing that our super-instanton counterexample was sick. We point out that within their own set of assumptions, the proof of Niedermayer et al regarding the correctness of perturbation theory is incorrect and provide a correct proof under more restrictive assumptions. We reply also to their claim that the S-matrix bootstrap approach of Balog et al supports the existence of asymptotic freedom in the O(3) model.- gauge field theory: nonabelian
- perturbation theory
- instanton
- S-matrix
- bootstrap
- sigma model: nonlinear
- symmetry: O(3)
- asymptotic freedom
References(14)
Figures(0)