Superiority of the h-index over the impact factor for physics

Aug, 2006
4 pages
e-Print:

Citations per year

0 Citations
Abstract:
Focusing specifically on physics periodicals, I show that the journal Impact Factor is not correlated with Hirsch's hh-index. This implies that the Impact Factor is not a good measure of research quality or influence because the hh-index is a reflection of peer review, and thus a strong indicator of research quality. The impact gap between multidisciplinary journals and physics-only journals is significantly reduced when hh is used instead of the Impact Factor. Additionally, the impact of journals specializing in review articles is inherently deflated using hh because of the limited number of annual publications in such periodicals. Finally, a reordering of the top ranking journals occurs with hh when only the physics articles of multidisciplinary journals are considered, falling more in line with the average physicist's interpretation of a journal's prestige.
Note:
  • Submitted to Am.J.Phys.
  • [6]
    • J.E. Hirsch
      • Proc.Nat.Acad.Sci. 102 (2005) 16569
  • [9]
    • L. Bornmann
      ,
    • H.-D. Daniel
      • Scientometrics 65 (2005) 391
  • [10]
    • A.F.J. van Raan
      • Scientometrics 67 (2006) 491
  • [12]
    • W. Kohn
      ,
    • L.J. Sham
      • Phys.Rev. 140 (1965) 1133
  • [13]
    Exceptions: J. Phys
    • Chem. A
    • [13]
      and B, the fission products of J. Phys. Chem all three are included under the parent name of J. Phys. Chem., using a logical OR to search. . started in 1991
      • J. Fluid Mech
      • [14]
        Cell and Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA are neglected here because their scope is more limited than Nature and Science their high IFs are likely a reflection of the relative physics and life-sciences populations (∼1:4, based on graduate degrees awarded per year in the USA, as per )