literature
Literature
Authors
Jobs
Seminars
Conferences

Popper's test of quantum mechanics and two-photon "ghost" diffraction

Jul, 2005
4 pages
e-Print:
Report number:
  • UAB-FT-582,
  • UAB-FT-582
View in:
pdf
reference search1 citation

Citations per year

20192020202101
Abstract: (arXiv)
A test on quantum mechanics proposed long ago by Karl Popper is reconsidered with further detail and new insight. An ambiguity in the proposal, which turns out to be essential in order to make the test conclusive, is identified and taken into account for the first time. Its implications for recently performed photon experiments [such as in D. V. Strekalov \textit{et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 74}, 3600 (1995)] are briefly analyzed.
Note:
  • 4 pages, 1 figure, REVTeX style
  • [1]
    Die
    • K.R. Popper
      • Naturwiss. 22 (1934) 807
  • [2]
    Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics, Hutchinson, London
    • K.R. Popper
  • [3]
    in Open Questions in Quantum Physics, Tarozzi G
    • K.R. Popper
  • [4]
    and 329, 112
    • K. Popper
      • Nature 328 (1987) 675
  • [5]
    • H. Krips
      • Brit.J.Phil.Sci. 35 (1984) 253
  • [6]
    • D. Bedford
      ,
    • F. Selleri
      • Lett.Nuovo Cim. 42 (1985) 325
  • [7]
    and 328, 675
    • M.J. Collett
      ,
    • R. Loudon
      • Nature 326 (1987) 671
  • [7]
    • P. Storey
      ,
    • M. Collett
      ,
    • D. Walls
      • Phys.Rev.Lett. 68 (1992) 472
  • [8]
    Stud. History Philos
    • A. Peres
  • [9]
    • R. Plaga
      • Found.Phys.Lett. 13 (2000) 461
  • [10]
    • A.J. Short
      • Found.Phys. 14 (2001) 275
  • [10]
    • A.J. Short
      • Fortsch.Phys. 51 (2003) 498
  • [11]
    • T. Qureshi
      • Int.J.Quant.Inf. 2 (2004) 407
  • [12]
    • T. Qureshi
      • Am.J.Phys. 73 (2005) 541
  • [13]
    • T. Qureshi
  • [15]
    • D.V. Strekalov
      • Phys.Rev.Lett. 74 (1995) 3600
  • [16]

      • in Fundamental Physics Meeting "Alberto Galindo", R. F. Alvarez-Estrada, A. Dobado, L. A. Fernandez, M. A. Martin-Delgado, A. Munoz Sudupe (Eds.). Aula Documental de Investigacion, Madrid, 2004, pp. 201-207
      •
    • e-Print:
  • [17]
    There is no need to consider explicitly the time evolution of our state from the source up to the screens, as done in Refs. [13] and [16] for massive particles, thanks to the tiny divergence of the beams