The Effective Number Density of Galaxies for Weak Lensing Measurements in the LSST Project
May 3, 201316 pages
Published in:
- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 434 (2013) 2121
e-Print:
- 1305.0793 [astro-ph.CO]
Report number:
- SLAC-PUB-15696
View in:
Citations per year
Abstract: (arXiv)
Future weak lensing surveys potentially hold the highest statistical power for constraining cosmological parameters compared to other cosmological probes. The statistical power of a weak lensing survey is determined by the sky coverage, the inverse of the noise in shear measurements, and the galaxy number density. The combination of the latter two factors is often expressed in terms of -- the "effective number density of galaxies used for weak lensing measurements". In this work, we estimate for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) project, the most powerful ground-based lensing survey planned for the next two decades. We investigate how the following factors affect the resulting of the survey with detailed simulations: (1) survey time, (2) shear measurement algorithm, (3) algorithm for combining multiple exposures, (4) inclusion of data from multiple filter bands, (5) redshift distribution of the galaxies, and (6) masking and blending. For the first time, we quantify in a general weak lensing analysis pipeline the sensitivity of to the above factors. We find that with current weak lensing algorithms, expected distributions of observing parameters, and all lensing data (- and -band, covering 18,000 degree of sky) for LSST, arcmin before considering blending and masking, arcmin when rejecting seriously blended galaxies and arcmin when considering an additional 15% loss of galaxies due to masking. With future improvements in weak lensing algorithms, these values could be expected to increase by up to 20%. Throughout the paper, we also stress the ways in which depends on our ability to understand and control systematic effects in the measurements.Note:
- 17 pages, 9 figures, 7 tables; accepted by MNRAS. Updated version (Oct 2014) contains correction to the intrinsic galaxy size distribution (Fig 1c). This results in small changes in Fig 1c, 1d, 6, 7, Tab 1, 2 and related numbers in the paper. Further updated version (Dec 2017) contain some clarification of the plots, and minor correction to Fig 5
References(73)
Figures(17)