Spatial density fluctuations and selection effects in galaxy redshift surveys

One of the main problems of observational cosmology is to determine the range in which a reliable measurement of galaxy correlations is possible. This corresponds to determining the shape of the correlation function, its possible evolution with redshift and the size and amplitude of large scale structures. Different selection effects, inevitably entering in any observation, introduce important constraints in the measurement of correlations. In the context of galaxy redshift surveys selection effects can be caused by observational techniques and strategies and by implicit assumptions used in the data analysis. Generally all these effects are taken into account by using pair-counting algorithms to measure two-point correlations. We review these methods stressing that they are based on the a-priori assumption that galaxy distribution is spatially homogeneous inside a given sample. We show that, when this assumption is not satisfied by the data, results of the correlation analysis are affected by finite size effects. In order to quantify these effects, we introduce a new method based on the computation of the gradient of galaxy counts along tiny cylinders. We show, by using artificial homogeneous and inhomogeneous point distributions, that this method identifies redshift dependent selection effects and disentangles them from the presence of large scale density fluctuations. We then apply this new method to several redshift catalogs and we find evidence that galaxy distribution, in those samples where selection effects are small enough, is characterized by power-law correlations with exponent γ=0.9 up to 20 Mpc/h followed by a change of slope that, in the range 20–100 Mpc/h, corresponds to a power-law exponent γ=0.25. Whether a crossover to spatial uniformity occurs at ~ 100 Mpc/h or larger scales cannot be clarified by the present data.

Note:

35 pages, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics in the press

superclusters
redshift surveys
cosmic web

References(46)

Figures(20)

[1]

York, D., et al The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary, Astron.J 120, , pg.1579

D. York

[2]

The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: spectra and redshifts Mon.Not.R.Acad.Soc., 328, , pg.1039

Colless M.
,
Maddox S.
,
Cole S.

[3]

Dark Energy

Drinkwater M. J.

[4]

Allende Prieto, C., et al The Ninth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: First Spectroscopic Data from the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey, Astrophys.J Suppl. 203, , pg.21

S.-I.C.C.P. Ahn
,
R. Alexandroff

[5]

Sylos Scale-invariance of galaxy clustering Phys.Rep. 293, , pg.61

Labini F.
,
Montuori
,
L. M. Pietronero

[6]

Cosmic Homogeneity Demonstrated with Luminous Red Galaxies Astrophys.J 264, , pg.54 11 12 13

Hogg D.W.

•

[7]

Sylos Labini F., Gabrielli A., et al Basic properties of galaxy clustering in the light of recent results from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Astron,Astrophys 443, , pg.11

Joyce M.

[8]

Sylos Baryshev, Yu. V., Power law correlations in galaxy distribution and finite volume effects from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release Four Astron,Astrophys 465, , pg.23

F. Labini
,
N.L. Vasilyev

[9]

Sylos Breaking the self-averaging properties of spatial galaxy fluctuations in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey - Data release six Astron,Astrophys 465, , pg.17

Labini
,
N.L. F. Vasilyev
,
Y.V. Baryshev

[10]

Sylos Absence of self-averaging and of homogeneity in the large-scale galaxy distribution Europhys.Lett. 88, , pg.49001

F. Labini

[11]

Sylos Persistent fluctuations in the distribution of galaxies from the Two-degree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey Europhys.Lett. 85, , pg.29002

F. Labini
,
N.L. Vasilyev
,
Y.V. Baryshev

[12]

Sylos Baryshev, Yu. V., Large-scale fluctuations in the distribution of galaxies from the two-degree galaxy redshift survey Astron,Astrophys 496, , pg.7

F. Labini
,
N.L. Vasilyev

[13]

Sylos Labini, F., Vasilyev, N.L Baryshev, Yu. V., Galaxy distribution and extreme-value statistics Europhys.Lett. 88, , pg.59002

T. Antal

[14]

Sylos Inhomogeneities in the universe Class.Quantum.Grav. 28, , pg.164003

Labini F.

[15]

Fractal dimensions of a weakly clustered distribution and the scale of homogeneity Mon.Not.R.Acad.Soc., 390, , pg.829

Bagla J.
,
Yadav J.
,
Seshadri T.

[16]

& Baryshev, Yu. V., Method for analysing the spatial distribution of galaxies on gigaparsec scales. I. Initial principles Astrophysics 53, , pg.91

N.V Nabokov

[17]

& Baryshev, Yu. V., Method for analysing the spatial distribution of galaxies on gigaparsec scales. II. Application to a grid of the HUDF-FDF-COSMOS-HDF surveys Astrophysics 53, , pg.101

N.V Nabokov

[18]

The Sloan Great Wall. Morphology and Galaxy Content Astrophys.J 736, , pg.51

Einasto M.

[19]

The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: the transition to large-scale cosmic homogeneity Mon.Not.R.Acad.Soc., 425, , pg.116

Scrimgeour M.

[20]

A structure in the early Universe at z=1.3 that exceeds the homogeneity scale of the R-W concordance cosmology Mon.Not.R.Acad.Soc., 429, , pg.2910

Clowes R. G.
,
Harris K. A.
,
Raghunathan S.
,
Campusano L. E.
,
Soechting I. K.

et al.

[21]

patterns in noise: Gigaparsec-scale ‘structures’ that do not violate homogeneity Mon.Not.R.Acad.Soc., 434, , pg.398

Nadathur S. Seeing

[22]

Quasar Clustering from SDSS DR5: Dependences on Physical Properties Astrophys.J 680 , pg. 169

Shen S.

[23]

Clustering of Low-Redshift (z ≤ 2.2) Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Astrophys.J 697 , pg.1634

Ross N.P.

[24]

Wu K.K.S The large-scale smoothness of the Universe Nature, 397, , pg.225

Lahav O.
,
Rees M.

[25]

The geometry of second-order statistics - biases in common estimators Astron,Astrophys 333, , pg.333

M. Kerscher

1-25 of 46
1
2
25 / page