Why Boltzmann Brains Are Bad

Feb 2, 2017
27 pages
e-Print:
Report number:
  • CALT-2017-004

Citations per year

201720192021202320243412
Abstract: (arXiv)
Some modern cosmological models predict the appearance of Boltzmann Brains: observers who randomly fluctuate out of a thermal bath rather than naturally evolving from a low-entropy Big Bang. A theory in which most observers are of the Boltzmann Brain type is generally thought to be unacceptable, although opinions differ. I argue that such theories are indeed unacceptable: the real problem is with fluctuations into observers who are locally identical to ordinary observers, and their existence cannot be swept under the rug by a choice of probability distributions over observers. The issue is not that the existence of such observers is ruled out by data, but that the theories that predict them are cognitively unstable: they cannot simultaneously be true and justifiably believed.
Note:
  • 27 pages. Invited submission to a volume on Current Controversies in Philosophy of Science, eds. Shamik Dasgupta and Brad Weslake
  • Boltzmann brain
  • fluctuation
  • cosmological model
  • big bang
  • thermal
  • statistical mechanics
  • philosophy
Loading ...