What have we learned about and from F(L)(x, Q**2) at HERA?

Aug, 1997
17 pages
Published in:
  • Phys.Lett.B 418 (1998) 371-382
e-Print:
Report number:
  • RAL-TR-97-039

Citations per year

1997200120052009201301234
Abstract:
Recently the H1 collaboration has published a ``determination'' of the structure function F_L(x,Q^2) at low x. I address the question of how reliable this determination really is. I argue that it is in fact a consistency check of a given theoretical approach rather than a real determination of the value of F_L(x,Q^2), but potentially a very useful one. I compare the consistency of different approaches, and indeed find that a LO--in--\alpha_s calculation of structure functions is completely ruled out. I also find that the ``determined'' values of F_L(x,Q^2) are surprisingly stable under changes in theoretical approach but, when working consistently within a well-defined theoretical framework, the values of F_L(x,Q^2) implied are somewhat lower than previously quoted.
Note:
  • Tex file, including modification of Harvmac, 17 pages plus 5 figures in .ps files Report-no: RAL-TR-088
  • electron p: deep inelastic scattering
  • structure function: longitudinal
  • small-x
  • statistical analysis
  • interpretation of experiments: DESY HERA Stor