A Nanoflare heating model for the quiet solar corona

Apr, 2001
12 pages
Published in:
  • Astron.Astrophys. 373 (2001) 318-328
e-Print:

Citations per year

20022007201220172022102
Abstract: (arXiv)
The energy input into the lower solar corona by flare evaporation events has been modeled according to the available observations for quiet regions. The question is addressed whether such heating events can provide the observed average level of the coronal emission measure and thus of the observed flux of extreme ultraviolet (EUV) and X-ray emission without contradicting the observed average power spectrum of the emission measure, the typical emission measure variations observed for individual pixels and the observed flare energy distribution. As the assumed flare height influences the derived flare energy, the mathematical foundations of nanoflare distributions and their conversion to different height assumptions are studied first. This also allows a comparison with various published energy distributions differing in height assumptions and to relate the observations to the input parameters of the heating model. An analytic evaluation of the power spectrum yields the relationship between the average time profile of nanoflares (or microflares), assumed to be self-similar in energy, and the power spectrum. We find that the power spectrum is very sensitive to the chosen time profile of the flares. Models are found by numerical simulation that fit all available observations. They are not unique but severely constrained. We concentrate on a model with a flare height proportional to the square root of the flare area. The existence of a fitting model demonstrates that nanoflare heating of the corona is a viable and attractive mechanism.
      • Astrophys.J. 544 550
      • Solar Phys. 182 349
      • Astron.Astrophys. 341 286
      • Astron.Astrophys. 336 1039
      • Astrophys.J. 422 381
      • NOONE SP-50 389
      • Astron.Astrophys. 137 63
      • Astrophys.J. 501 L213
      • Astrophys.J. 488 499
      • Astrophys.J. 190 447
      • Astrophys.J. 264 642
      • Astrophys.J. 529 554