Iron line profiles in strong gravity

Feb, 2004
12 pages
Published in:
  • Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 352 (2004) 353
e-Print:

Citations per year

200320082013201820230246810
Abstract: (arXiv)
We describe a new code which can accurately calculate the relativistic effects which distort the emission from an accretion disc around a black hole. We compare our results for a disk which extends from the innermost stable orbit to 20rg20r_{g} in both Schwarzschild and maximal (a=0.998a=0.998) Kerr spacetimes with the two line profile codes which are on general release in the XSPEC spectral fitting package. These models generally give a very good description of the relativistic smearing of the line for this range of radii. However, these models have some limitations. In particular we show that the assumed form of the {\em angular} emissivity law (limb darkening or brightening) can make significant changes to the derived line profile where lightbending is important. This is {\em always} the case for extreme Kerr spacetimes or high inclination systems, where the observed line is produced from a very large range of different emitted angles. In these situations the assumed angular emissivity can affect the derived {\em radial} emissivity. The line profile is not simply determined by the well defined (but numerically difficult) physical effects of strong gravity, but is also dependent on the poorly known astrophysics of the disc emission.
      • Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 201 327
      • Astrophys.J. 1994 435
      • Phys.Rev. 1968 174
      • Astrophys.J. 1975 202
      • Astrophys.J. 1973 183
      • Astrophys.J. 1991 367
      • Astrophys.J. 1993 403
      • Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 1989 238
      • Astrophys.J. 2000 528
      • Publ.Astron.Soc.Jap. 1997 49
      • Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 2003 342
      • Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 2001 325
      • Astrophys.J. 1997 112
      • Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 1996 282
      • Astrophys.J. 1991 376
      • Astron.Astrophys. 1979 75
      • Astrophys.J. 2000 535
      • Astrophys.J. 2000 537
      • Astrophys.J. 1994 421
      • Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 1999 306
      • Nature 1995 375
      • Astron.Astrophys. 1993 272
      • Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 2001 328
      • Astron.Astrophys. 2003 406
      • Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 1998 301