Educating the Next Generation of Leading Scientists: Turning Ideas into Action

Mar, 2009
10 pages
e-Print:

Citations per year

0 Citations
Abstract: (arXiv)
The core of scientific research is turning new ideas into reality. From the school science fair to the search for the secrets of dark energy, high-quality research consists of scientific investigation constrained within the scope of a well-defined project. Large or small, generously funded or just scraping by,scientific projects use time, money, and information to turn ideas into plans, plans into action, and action into results. While we, as a community, do much to educate students in the techniques of research, we do not systematically train students in the nature and organization of scientific projects or in the techniques of project management. We propose a two-pronged attack to address this issue in the next decade. First, to generate a broad base of future scientists who have a basic familiarity with the ideas of projects, we propose that the community develop standards for the content of a project design and management course in astronomy and astrophysics. Second, to train future scientists to assume leadership roles in new investigations in astronomy and astrophysics, we propose that the community develop standards for graduate programs in the area of research project leadership.
  • (2000). Astronomical Publication in the Near Future
    • H.A. Abt
        • Publ.Astron.Soc.Pac. 112 1417
    • (2002). Why do we still not apply what we know about managing R&D personnel?
      • T.E. Clarke
      • Research Technology Management, Volume 45, Number 2, 9-11
        • (2006). Leadership in Science
          • G. Davis
          • Joint Explanatory Statement (2009)
            • of Division A
            • Retrieved February 24, 2009, from
            • (1957). Priorities in Scientific
              • R.K. Merton
              • in the Sociology of Science
                • Discovery A. Chapter
                • American Sociological Review, Volume 22, Number 6, 635-659
                  • (2008). Is the Hubble Space Telescope Worth Saving?
                    • C. Moskowitz
                    • Retrieved December 31, 2008, from ,2933,431463,00.html
                    • National Professional Science Master's Association. (2008)
                      • Retrieved January 21, 2009, from
                      • Project Management Institute (2004). to the Project Management Body of Knowledge
                        • A. Guide
                        • Third Edition (PMBOK Guides). Project Management Institute
                          • (2000). The Demise of the Superconducting Super Collider
                            • M. Riordan
                            • Physics in Perspective, Volume 2, Number 4, 411-425
                              • (2009). Leadership Education in the Natural Sciences
                                • R.E. Schulte-Ladbeck
                                • Journal of Ladership Education, submitted
                                  • (2002)
                                    • S.J. Smith
                                      ,
                                    • L. Pedersen-Gallegos
                                      ,
                                    • C. Riegle-Crumb
                                    • The training, careers, and work of Ph.D. physical scientists Not simply
                                      • Am.J.Phys., Number 70, Issue 11, 1081-1092
                                        • (1961). Impact of Large-Scale Science on the United States
                                          • A.M. Weinberg