First, we evaluate the plasma parameters in the flaring loop. We have chosen to evaluate the thermal parameters by using the short time interval of 02:08:52-02:09:00 UT just before the studied interval of 02:09:00-02:10:00 UT. The HXR spectrum during the 02:08:52-02:09:00 UT interval was fitted with a combined thermal function plus a cold thick-target nonthermal function (e.g., using the SSW/OSPEX functions f_vth + f_thick2). Although both nonthermal and thermal components are included in the modeling, this step is primarily used to estimate, 7: #apjaafad3fn5 the thermal plasma parameters of the coronal loop-top source, namely the temperature T (keV) and the emission measure EM0 (cm-3)

the nonthermal parameters will be determined more accurately later. The minimum value of the reduced χ2 gives the best estimates of T and EM0. Even though the fitting is performed with an assumed power-law form for the cold thick-target nonthermal component, we have found that using another form (such as a kappa distribution) does not substantially affect the inferred values of the thermal parameters EM0 and T. (For SOL-05-13T02:12, the relative abundance parameter was fixed at the default value of unity, and we determined best-fit values of T = (2.52 ± 0.03) keV and EM0 = (6.51 ± 0.30) × 1048 cm-3 for 02:08:52-02:09:00 UT. Note that throughout this work, 1σ OSPEX uncertainties are used, unless stated otherwise.)

With the values of EM0 and T now determined, we fit the HXR spectrum during our study time interval of 02:09:00-02:10:00 UT. The HXR spectrum during this time interval is fitted with f_vth and the warm-target fitting function f_thick_warm. Note that the total emission measure EM = EM0 + ΔEM obtained by this fit includes any contribution ΔEM from the thermalization of injected electrons. Any additional parameters/contributions pertinent to the observed flux (e.g., elemental abundances, albedo, pulse pile-up, lines, drm_mod, etc.) should also be included in this fit (Figure, 2: #apjaafad3f2). The function f_thick_warm contains 10 parameters: the first six parameters are exactly the same as for f_thick2 (i.e., the electron acceleration rate \dot{{N}_{0}} (s-1), the spectral index (low) δlow, the break energy EB (keV), the spectral index (high) δhigh, the low-energy cutoff Ec (keV), and the high energy cutoff EH (keV)). The other four parameters relate to the properties of the thermal properties of the corona: the loop temperature Tloop (keV), loop density nloop (cm-3), and half-length of the loop L (cm), and the relative elemental abundances.a. As discussed in Step 1, an isothermal estimate of the loop-top temperature, T, is determined using f_vth during 02:08:50-02:09:00 UT, and we fix {T}_{\mathrm{loop}}\,=T=2.52\,\mathrm{keV}.b. To determine the density {n}_{\mathrm{loop}}, we use the estimate of EM0 obtained in Step 1. The number density can then be estimated using {n}_{\mathrm{loop}}=\sqrt{{\mathrm{EM}}_{0}/V}, where V is the volume of the emitting plasma, found from X-ray imaging (see Figure, 3: #apjaafad3f3). (For SOL-05-13T02:12, the volume was estimated by applying the imaging algorithm Visibility Forward Fitting (VIS_FWDFIT

2007: #apjaafad3bib42). Using VIS_FWDFIT, the volume of the coronal source varies with energy (see Jeffrey et al

a. As discussed in Step 1, an isothermal estimate of the loop-top temperature, T, is determined using f_vth during 02:08:50-02:09:00 UT, and we fix {T}_{\mathrm{loop}}\,=T=2.52\,\mathrm{keV}

b. To determine the density {n}_{\mathrm{loop}}, we use the estimate of EM0 obtained in Step 1. The number density can then be estimated using {n}_{\mathrm{loop}}=\sqrt{{\mathrm{EM}}_{0}/V}, where V is the volume of the emitting plasma, found from X-ray imaging (see Figure, 3: #apjaafad3f3). (For SOL-05-13T02:12, the volume was estimated by applying the imaging algorithm Visibility Forward Fitting (VIS_FWDFIT

2007: #apjaafad3bib42). Using VIS_FWDFIT, the volume of the coronal source varies with energy (see Jeffrey et al

c. The half-length L of the loop (the length from the coronal source to the chromospheric footpoint), is estimated directly from the image (see Figure, 3: #apjaafad3f3). (For SOL-05-13T02:12, we estimate from the X-ray image (blue curve in Figure, 3: #apjaafad3f3 left) that L=(24\pm 5)^{\prime\prime} \sim (17\pm 3.5) Mm.)

Once the plasma parameters {n}_{\mathrm{loop}}, {T}_{\mathrm{loop}}, and L have been determined and fixed, then the remaining nonthermal parameters of the f_thick_warm fit, namely (\dot{{N}_{0}}, {\delta }_{\mathrm{low}}, EB, {\delta }_{\mathrm{high}}, Ec and EH), can be determined during 02:09:00-02:10:00 UT. As usual, we suggest that EH be fixed at the high default value, and that EB and {\delta }_{\mathrm{high}} are left free only if required (otherwise keep them fixed with EB above the highest energy in the fit). (For SOL-05-13T02:12, we find {E}_{c}=(12.1\,\pm 0.3) keV, \dot{{N}_{0}}=(12.8\pm 0.6)\times {10}^{35} electrons s-1 and {\delta }_{\mathrm{low}}\,=\delta =(4.25\pm 0.02).)

The nonthermal electron power can now be determined as P=(\delta -1)/(\delta -2)\,\dot{{N}_{0}}{E}_{c}, as for the cold thick-target case (Equation (, 4: #apjaafad3eqn4)), as we assume a power-law form for the accelerated electrons. (For SOL-05-13T02:12, we find P\,=(35.8\pm 1.9)\times {10}^{27} erg s-1.)

As L becomes smaller (decreasing from 40 to 5 Mm), Ec decreases from 20 to 5 keV and the power P correspondingly increases. This is because the smaller column density in the corona means that fewer accelerated electrons thermalize there. The estimated uncertainty in L of ±3.5 Mm leads to an uncertainty of ±2 keV in Ec that is not accounted for in OSPEX

Decreasing the plasma number density {n}_{\mathrm{loop}} similarly lowers the coronal column density, hence the number of accelerated electrons thermalized there

a similar variation in Ec hence results. Again, the estimated uncertainty in {n}_{\mathrm{loop}} of ±2.1 × 1010 cm-3 leads to an uncertainty of ±2 keV in Ec that is not accounted for in OSPEX

Keeping the temperature, T, from f_vth fixed, but varying the f_thick_warm parameter {T}_{\mathrm{loop}} (\ne T) between {T}_{\mathrm{loop}}=4.0\,\mathrm{keV} and {T}_{\mathrm{loop}}=1.5\,\mathrm{keV}, decreases Ec from ~16 keV down to ~7 keV. This is because, once again, a lower value of {T}_{\mathrm{loop}} results in a smaller number of accelerated electrons blending into the thermal background, so that the nonthermal tail now extends to lower values of Ec

ADS:

ADS:

ADS:

Crossref:

ADS:

LRSP 5 1, Crossref:

ADS:

SoPh 18 489, Crossref:

ADS:

AGU Fall Meeting #SH44A-07, ADS: