Optimized continuous dynamical decoupling via differential geometry and machine learning - INSPIRE

DataBETA

Optimized continuous dynamical decoupling via differential geometry and machine learning

Nicolas André da Costa Morazotti
(
- Sao Paulo U., Sao Carlos and
- U. Sao Paulo (main)
)
,
Adonai Hilário da Silva
(
- Sao Paulo U., Sao Carlos and
- U. Sao Paulo (main)
)
,
Gabriel Audi
(
- Sao Paulo U., Sao Carlos and
- U. Sao Paulo (main)
)
,
Reginaldo de Jesus Napolitano
(
- Sao Paulo U., Sao Carlos and
- U. Sao Paulo (main)
)
,
Felipe Fernandes Fanchini
(
- Sao Carlos Federal U. and
- Sao Paulo, IFT and
- U. Sao Paulo (main)
)

Oct 12, 2023

14 pages

Published in:

Phys.Rev.A 110 (2024) 4, 042601

Published: Oct 1, 2024

e-Print:

2310.08417 [quant-ph]

DOI:

10.1103/PhysRevA.110.042601 (publication)

View in:

ADS Abstract Service

reference search1 citation

Citations per year

Abstract: (APS)

We introduce a strategy to develop optimally designed fields for continuous dynamical decoupling. Using our methodology, we obtain the optimal continuous field configuration to maximize the fidelity of a general one-qubit quantum gate. To achieve this, considering dephasing-noise perturbations, we employ an auxiliary qubit instead of the boson bath to implement a purification scheme, which results in unitary dynamics. Employing the sub-Riemannian geometry framework for the two-qubit unitary group, we derive and numerically solve the geodesic equations, obtaining the optimal time-dependent control Hamiltonian. Also, due to the extended time required to find solutions to the geodesic equations, we train a neural network on a subset of geodesic solutions, enabling us to promptly generate the time-dependent control Hamiltonian for any desired gate, which is crucial in circuit optimization.

Note:

14 pages, 10 figures

gate
geodesic
decoupling
Hamiltonian
time dependence
unitarity
geometry
optimization
qubit
neural network

References(59)

Figures(10)

[1]

Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms

Kishor Bharti
(
- Singapore Natl. U.
)
,
Alba Cervera-Lierta
(
- Toronto U.
)
,
Thi Ha Kyaw
(
- Toronto U.
)
,
Tobias Haug
(
- Imperial Coll., London
)
,
Sumner Alperin-Lea
(
- Toronto U.
)

et al.

- Rev.Mod.Phys. 94 (2022) 1, 015004
•
e-Print:
- 2101.08448
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.94.015004

[2]

Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond

John Preskill
(
- Caltech, IQI
)

- Quantum 2 (2018) 79
•
e-Print:
- 1801.00862
•
DOI:
- 10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79

[3]

Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit

Google Quantum AI

Collaboration

•

Rajeev Acharya
(
- Google Inc.
)

et al.

- Nature 614 (2023) 7949, 676-681
•
e-Print:
- 2207.06431
•
DOI:
- 10.1038/s41586-022-05434-1

[4]

Methods and results for quantum optimal pulse control on superconducting qubit systems, in 2022 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW), Los Alamitos, CA (, Piscataway, NJ, ), pp. 600–606

E. Matekole
,
Y. Fang
,
M. Lin

[5]

Robust dynamical decoupling with concatenated continuous driving

et al.

- New J.Phys. 14 (2012) 11, 113023
•
DOI:
- 10.1088/1367-2630/14/11/113023

[6]

Protecting quantum spin coherence of nanodiamonds in living cells

Q.-Y. Cao
,
P.-C. Yang
,
M.-S. Gong
,
M. Yu
,
A. Retzker

et al.

- Phys.Rev.Applied 13 (2020) 024021
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.024021

[7]

(, Cambridge, England, )

M.A. Nielsen
,
I.L. Chuang

[8]

Large-scale modular quantum-computer architecture with atomic memory and photonic interconnects

C. Monroe
(
- Maryland U., College Park
)
,
R. Raussendorf
(
- British Columbia U.
)
,
A. Ruthven
(
- British Columbia U.
)
,
K.R. Brown
(
- Georgia Tech., Atlanta
)
,
P. Maunz
(
- Duke U. (main)
)

et al.

- Phys.Rev.A 89 (2014) 2, 022317
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.022317

[9]

On-demand directional microwave photon emission using waveguide quantum electrodynamics

Bharath Kannan
(
- MIT
)
,
Aziza Almanakly
(
- MIT
)
,
Youngkyu Sung
(
- MIT
)
,
Agustin Di Paolo
(
- MIT
)
,
David A. Rower
(
- MIT and
- MIT, Cambridge, Dept. Phys.
)

et al.

- Nature Phys. 19 (2023) 3, 394-400,
- Nature Physics (2023)
•
e-Print:
- 2203.01430
•
DOI:
- 10.1038/s41567-022-01869-5

[10]

Maintaining coherence in quantum computers

W.G. Unruh
(
- British Columbia U.
)

- Phys.Rev.A 51 (1995) 992
•
e-Print:
- hep-th/9406058
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.51.992

[11]

Quantum brachistochrone curves as geodesics: Obtaining accurate minimum-time protocols for the control of quantum systems

X. Wang
,
M. Allegra
,
K. Jacobs
,
S. Lloyd
,
C. Lupo

et al.

- Phys.Rev.Lett. 114 (2015) 170501
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.170501

[12]

Mitigating controller noise in quantum gates using optimal control theory

- Quantum 8 (2024) 1482,
- Quantum 8 (2024) 1482
•
e-Print:
- 2309.07659
•
DOI:
- 10.22331/q-2024-09-25-1482

[13]

Coherence control for qubits

K.M. Fonseca-Romero
,
S. Kohler
,
P. Hänggi

- Chem.Phys. 296 (2004) 307
•
DOI:
- 10.1016/j.chemphys.2003.09.015

[14]

Coherence stabilization of a two-qubit gate by ac fields

K.M. Fonseca-Romero
,
S. Kohler
,
P. Hänggi

- Phys.Rev.Lett. 95 (2005) 140502
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.140502

[15]

Geometric continuous dynamical decoupling with bounded controls

P. Chen

- Phys.Rev.A 73 (2006) 022343
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.022343

[16]

Continuously decoupling single-qubit operations from a perturbing thermal bath of scalar bosons

F.F. Fanchini
,
J.E.M. Hornos
,
R.d.J. Napolitano

- Phys.Rev.A 75 (2007) 022329
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.022329

[17]

Non-Abelian gauge invariance from dynamical decoupling

Valentin Kasper
(
- ICFO, Barcelona and
- Harvard U.
)
,
Torsten V. Zache
(
)
,
Fred Jendrzejewski
(
- Kirchhoff Inst. Phys.
)
,
Maciej Lewenstein
(
- ICFO, Barcelona and
- ICREA, Barcelona
)
,
Erez Zohar
(
- Hebrew U.
)

- Phys.Rev.D 107 (2023) 1, 014506
•
e-Print:
- 2012.08620
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014506

[18]

Optimizing continuous dynamical decoupling with machine learning

Miao Cai
,
Keyu Xia

- Phys.Rev.A 106 (2022) 4, 042434
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.106.042434

[19]

Protecting operations on qudits from noise by continuous dynamical decoupling

R. de J. Napolitano
,
F.F. Fanchini
,
A.H.D. Silva
,
B. Bellomo

- Phys.Rev.Res. 3 (2021) 013235
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013235

[20]

Characterization and control of open quantum systems beyond quantum noise spectroscopy

Akram Youssry
(
- Sydney, U. Technol. and
- Ain Shams U., Cairo
)
,
Gerardo A. Paz-Silva
(
- Griffith U.
)
,
Christopher Ferrie
(
- Sydney, U. Technol.
)

- npj Quantum Inf. 6 (2020) 95
•
DOI:
- 10.1038/s41534-020-00332-8

[21]

Environmental noise spectroscopy with qubits subjected to dynamical decoupling

P. Szańkowski
(
- Warsaw, Inst. Phys.
)
,
G. Ramon
(
- Santa Clara U.
)
,
J. Krzywda
(
- Warsaw U.
)
,
D. Kwiatkowski
(
- Warsaw, Inst. Phys.
)
,
Ł Cywiński
(
- Warsaw, Inst. Phys.
)

- J.Phys.Condens.Matter 29 (2017) 33, 333001
•
DOI:
- 10.1088/1361-648X/aa7648

[22]

Measuring the Spectrum of Colored Noise by Dynamical Decoupling

- Phys.Rev.Lett. 107 (2011) 23, 230501
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.230501

[23]

Estimation of the laser frequency noise spectrum by continuous dynamical decoupling

M. Zhang
,
Y. Xie
,
J. Zhang
,
W. Wang
,
C. Wu

et al.

- Phys.Rev.Applied 15 (2021) 014033
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.014033

[24]

Measurement of the noise spectrum using a multiple-pulse sequence

T. Yuge
,
S. Sasaki
,
Y. Hirayama

- Phys.Rev.Lett. 107 (2011) 170504
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.170504

[25]

Direct measurement of the system–environment coupling as a tool for understanding decoherence and dynamical decoupling

I. Almog
,
Y. Sagi
,
G. Gordon
,
G. Bensky
,
G. Kurizki

et al.

- J.Phys.B 44 (2011) 154006
•
DOI:
- 10.1088/0953-4075/44/15/154006

1-25 of 59
1
2
3
25 / page