Testing Universality in Critical Exponents: the Case of Rainfall

Aug 26, 2015
9 pages
Published in:
  • Phys.Rev.E 93 (2016) 4, 042301
  • Published: Apr 1, 2016
e-Print:

Citations per year

0 Citations
Abstract: (APS)
One of the key clues to consider rainfall as a self-organized critical phenomenon is the existence of power-law distributions for rain-event sizes. We have studied the problem of universality in the exponents of these distributions by means of a suitable statistic whose distribution is inferred by several variations of a permutational test. In contrast to more common approaches, our procedure does not suffer from the difficulties of multiple testing and does not require the precise knowledge of the uncertainties associated to the power-law exponents. When applied to seven sites monitored by the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program the tests lead to the rejection of the universality hypothesis, despite the fact that the exponents are rather close to each other. We discuss the reasons of the rejection.
  • [1]
    Statistical Mechanics of Phase Transitions. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford
    • J.M. Yeomans
  • [3]
    Introduction To Percolation Theory. CRC Press, 2nd edition
    • D. Stauffer
      ,
    • A. Aharony
  • [4]
    Complexity and Criticality. Imperial College Press, London
    • K. Christensen
      ,
    • N.R. Moloney
  • [5]
    Anomalous diffusion in disordered media: statistical mechanisms, models and physical applications
    • J.-P. Bouchaud
      ,
    • A. Georges
      • Phys.Rept. 195 (1990) 127-293
  • [6]
    Scaling in the timing of extreme events. Chaos. Solit. Fract., 74:99-112
    • A. Corral
  • [8]
    Point-occurrence self-similarity in crackling-noise systems and in other complex systems
    • A. Corral
      • J.Stat.Mech.P 01022 2009
  • [9]
    On estimating the exponent of power-law frequency distributions. Ecol., 89:905-912
    • E.P. White
      ,
    • B.J. Enquist
      ,
    • J.L. Green
  • [10]
    Power-law distributions in empirical data
    • A. Clauset
      ,
    • C.R. Shalizi
      ,
    • M.E.J. Newman
      • SIAM Rev. 51 (2009) 661-703
  • [11]
    Noncharacteristic half-lives in radioactive decay
    • A. Corral
      ,
    • F. Font
      ,
    • J. Camacho
      • Phys.Rev.E 83 (2011) P066103
  • [12]
    Universality of rain event size distributions
    • O. Peters
      ,
    • A. Deluca
      ,
    • A. Corral
      ,
    • J.D. Neelin
      ,
    • C.E. Holloway
      • J.Stat.Mech.P 11030 2010
  • [13]
    Fitting and goodness-of-fit test of non-truncated and truncated power-law distributions. Acta
    • A. Deluca
      ,
    • A. Corral
      • Geophysics 61 (2013) 1351-1394
  • [14]
    Statistical similarity between the compression of a porous material and earthquakes
    • J. Baró
      ,
    • A. Corral
      ,
    • X. Illa
      ,
    • A. Planes
      ,
    • E.K.H. Salje
    et al.
      • Phys.Rev.Lett. 110 (2013) 088702
  • [15]
    How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality. Copernicus, New York
    • P. Bak
  • [16]
    A complexity view of rainfall
    • O. Peters
      ,
    • C. Hertlein
      ,
    • K. Christensen
      • Phys.Rev.Lett. 88 (2002) 018701
  • [17]
    Rain: Relaxations in the sky
    • O. Peters
      ,
    • K. Christensen
      • Phys.Rev.E 66 (2002) 036120
  • [18]
    Rain Gauge and Tipping Bucket Rain Gauge Comparisons at the ARM Climate Research Facility TWP Sites. (Accessed Feb)
    • M.T. Ritsche
      ,
    • D.J. Holdridge
      ,
    • A. Dieso
      ,
    • A. Kanta
      ,
    • J. Prell Optical
  • [19]
    Analysis of rainfall records: possible relation to self-organized criticality
    • R.F.S. Andrade
      ,
    • H.J. Schellnhuber
      ,
    • M. Claussen
      • Physica A 254 (1998) 557-568
  • [20]
    Scale invariant events and dry spells for medium-resolution local rain data. Nonli. Proc
    • A. Deluca
      ,
    • A. Corral
      • Geophysics 21 (2014) 555-567
  • [22]
    Parameter estimation for the truncated Pareto distribution
    • I.B. Aban
      ,
    • M.M. Meerschaert
      ,
    • A.K. Panorska
      • J.Am.Statist.Assoc. 101 (2006) 270-277
  • [23]
    For instance, at a significance level of 5 % the uncertainty of ˆτi is given by ±zcσi, with zc = 1.96. If σ1 = σ2 = σ, the probability of |ˆτ1 - ˆτ2| > √ 2σzc is indeed Prob{|z| > zc} = 0.05, but testing if |ˆτ1 - ˆτ2| > 2σzc reduces drastically the significance level to Prob{|z| > √ 2zc} = 0.0066
    • [24]
      Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. Brit. Med J., 310:170-170
      • J.M. Bland
        ,
      • D.G. Altman
    • [25]
      Bonferroni and šidák corrections for multiple comparisons. In N. J. Salkind, editor Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics, pages 103-107. Sage, Thousand Oaks
      • H. Abdi