Analysis of the single production in neutrino neutral current interactions and instrumentation developments for the future understanding of neutrino physics using the ND280 detector of the T2K experiment
Jul 22, 2022307 pages
Supervisor:
Thesis: PhD - Barcelona, Autonoma U.
- Published: Jul 22, 2022
URN/HDL:
Citations per year
0 Citations
Abstract:
Nowadays, one of the most active research fields within the domain of high energy physics is
the study of neutrinos. In the mainstream theory, encompassed in the Standard Model (SM)
of particle physics, the phenomenology of neutrino physics is determined by seven degrees of
freedom, consisting of three masses (m1,m2,m3), three mixing angles (.12, .13, .23) and a
CP-violating phase (dCP). Currently, the most prominent experimental challenge in neutrino
physics is to determine precisely the values of these parameters in order to better understand the
fundamental behavior of nature and to to explore the validity of the SM.
The Tokai-To-Kamioka (T2K) experiment is one of the main references in the field. In T2K an
accelerator-based neutrino or antineutrino beam is produced and measured at two sites: At 280 m
from the production point using the ND280 detector and 295 km away in the Super-Kamiokande
detector. ND280 is used to characterize the properties of the neutrino beam before any significant
oscillation effects take place and to study how neutrinos scatter in matter at energies relevant
to T2K. With this knowledge, an event rate prediction is calculated for Super-Kamiokande
that in combination with data is used to measure neutrino properties, in particular .13, .23,
m223 = m22 - m23 and dCP.
Two factors limit more accurate measurements in T2K. On one hand, the limited number of
collected neutrino events determines the amount of statistical error. On the other hand, event
rate predictions are affected by systematic uncertainties regarding the detector, beam, and
neutrino interaction models. While the statistical error will decrease in the coming years as
T2K continues to collect data, active work is needed to reduce systematic uncertainties. In this
thesis two ways to achieve it are studied consisting of analysis and instrumentation developments.
In T2K’s oscillation analysis (OA) one of the main sources of systematic uncertainty is that of
neutrino neutral current interactions that produce a single p+ in the final state (NC1p+). Current
knowledge about this process is limited due to the fact that the only reported measurement
consists of less than hundred interactions recorded in 1978 by the Gargamelle bubble chamber
experiment. In this thesis, the first study of this type of interactions in a modern neutrino
experiment is presented using T2K data collected by the ND280 detector. With this purpose,
a new selection algorithm for ND280 data has been developed. The preliminary analysis
of the output selected samples constitutes the most detailed description of the nature of this
process. In addition, the extracted cross section uncertainty is less than half of that currently used
in T2K OA and thus has the potential to significantly benefit future T2K oscillation measurements.
Improving existing instruments is an essential task to reduce systematic uncertainties. To this end,
the ND280 detector is being significantly upgraded with the addition of three new detection technologies:
two new High-Angle TimeProjection-Chambers (HATPCs), a novel fully Super-Fine-
Grain-Detector (SuperFGD) and six Time-Of-Flight (ToF). In this thesis, relevant contributions
to the development of these technologies are presented, including: simulation-based sensitivity
studies, validation tests of the novel ERAM-based readout of the HATPCs, measurements of the
response and the PID potential of SuperFGD using prototype data and the development of new
deep learning reconstruction methods for SuperFGD and the ToF panels.- Neutri
- Neutrino
- Ciències Experimentals
- 53
- neutrino/mu: secondary beam
- antineutrino/mu: secondary beam
- neutrino: oscillation
- pi+: neutrinoproduction
- phase: CP
- neutrino: mass difference
References(620)
Figures(0)
- [1]
- [2]
- [3]
- [4]
- [5]
- [6]
- [7]
- [8]
- [9]
- [10]
- [11]
- [12]
- [13]
- [14]
- [15]
- [16]
- [17]
- [18]
- [19]
- [20]
- [21]
- [22]
- [23]
- [24]
- [25]