Numerical-relativity surrogate model for hyperbolic encounters of black holes: Challenges in parameter estimation

Fontbuté, Joan; Andrade, Tomas; Luna, Raimon; Calderón Bustillo, Juan; Morrás, Gonzalo; Jaraba, Santiago; García-Bellido, Juan; Izquierdo, Germán López

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.044024

Numerical-relativity surrogate model for hyperbolic encounters of black holes: Challenges in parameter estimation

Sep 25, 2024

18 pages

Published in:

Phys.Rev.D 111 (2025) 4, 044024

Published: Feb 10, 2025

e-Print:

2409.16742 [gr-qc]

DOI:

10.1103/PhysRevD.111.044024 (publication)

Report number:

LIGO-P-2400379

View in:

ADS Abstract Service

pdf

reference search5 citations

Citations per year

Abstract: (APS)

We present a surrogate numerical-relativity model for close hyperbolic black-hole encounters with equal masses and spins aligned with the orbital momentum. Our model, generated in terms of the Newman–Penrose scalar

ψ_{4}

, spans impact parameters

b / M \in [11, 15]

and spin components

χ_{i} \in [- 0.5, 0.5]

, modeling the

(ℓ, m) = (2, 0)

,

(2, \pm 2)

,

(3, \pm 2)

, and

(4, \pm 4)

emission multipoles. The model is faithful to numerical-relativity simulations, yielding mismatches lower than

10^{- 3}

. We test the ability of our model to recover the parameters of numerically simulated signals. We find that, despite the high accuracy of the model, parameter inference struggles to correctly capture the parameters of the source even for SNRs as large as 50 due to the strong degeneracies present in the parameter space. This indicates that correctly identifying these systems will require extremely large signal loudness, which is only typical of third generation detectors. Nevertheless, we also find that, if one attempts to infer certain combinations of such degenerated parameters, there might be a chance to prove the existence of this type of event, even with the current ground-based detectors, as long as these combinations make sense astrophysically and cosmologically.

Note:

18 pages, 15 figures

References(69)

Figures(15)

[1]

Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

LIGO Scientific and
Virgo

Collaborations

•

B.P. Abbott
(
- Caltech
)

et al.

- Phys.Rev.Lett. 116 (2016) 6, 061102
•
e-Print:
- 1602.03837
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

[2]

GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs

LIGO Scientific and
Virgo

Collaborations

•

B.P. Abbott
(
- LIGO Lab., Caltech
)

et al.

- Phys.Rev.X 9 (2019) 3, 031040
•
e-Print:
- 1811.12907
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040

[3]

GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

LIGO Scientific and
Virgo

Collaborations

•

R. Abbott
(
- LIGO Lab., Caltech
)

et al.

- Phys.Rev.X 11 (2021) 021053
•
e-Print:
- 2010.14527
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021053

[4]

GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

Collaborations

•

R. Abbott
(
- LIGO Lab., Caltech
)

et al.

- Phys.Rev.X 13 (2023) 4, 041039,
- Phys. Rev. X; 13(4):041039; 2023
•
e-Print:
- 2111.03606
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039

[5]

First Constraints on Compact Binary Environments from LIGO-Virgo Data

Giada Caneva Santoro
(
- Barcelona, IFAE
)
,
Soumen Roy
(
- NIKHEF, Amsterdam and
- Utrecht U.
)
,
Rodrigo Vicente
(
- Barcelona, IFAE
)
,
Maria Haney
(
- NIKHEF, Amsterdam
)
,
Ornella Juliana Piccinni
(
- Barcelona, IFAE
)

et al.

- Phys.Rev.Lett. 132 (2024) 25, 251401
•
e-Print:
- 2309.05061
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.251401

[6]

Detectability of dense-environment effects on black-hole mergers: The scalar field case, higher-order ringdown modes, and parameter biases

- Phys.Rev.D 108 (2023) 12, 124079
•
e-Print:
- 2308.03250
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.124079

[7]

Gravitational wave observatories may be able to detect hyperbolic encounters of black holes

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 508 (2021) 4, 5064-5073,
- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 508 (2021) 5064-5073
•
e-Print:
- 2010.00916
•
DOI:
- 10.1093/mnras/stab2721