Do JWST reionization (optical depth) puzzle, cosmological tensions, and CMB anomalies imply Harrison-Zel'dovich spectrum?

Li, Hao-Hao; Zhang, Xin-zhe; Qiu, Taotao; Xia, Jun-Qing

Do JWST reionization (optical depth) puzzle, cosmological tensions, and CMB anomalies imply Harrison-Zel'dovich spectrum?

Mar 10, 2025

22 pages

e-Print:

2503.06941 [astro-ph.CO]

View in:

ADS Abstract Service

pdf

reference search0 citations

Citations per year

0 Citations

Abstract: (arXiv)

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has observed massive galaxies at high redshifts, which implies an earlier epoch of reionization (EoR) compared with the cosmic microwave background (CMB) results. In this paper, based on \texttt{Planck 2020} (NPIPE release), \texttt{ACT DR4} and \texttt{SPT-3G} data, if assumed a Harrison-Zel'dovich (HZ) primordial power spectrum in the standard cosmological model, we discover that the redshift or optical depth of reionization is larger than the case of a power-law (PL) primordial power spectrum. In HZ-

\Lambda

CDM model, the redshift of reionization is

z_\text{reio} = 9.11 \pm 0.61

, which is consistent with the JWST result that

z_\text{reio} \approx 8.9

. Moreover, the cosmological tensions, i.e. Hubble (

H_0

) tension and

S_8

tension are alleviated in HZ-

\Lambda

CDM case. The Hubble constant is

H_0 = 70.38 \pm 0.35 \, \text{km}/\text{s}/\text{Mpc}

and the structure growth parameter is

S_8 = 0.7645\pm 0.0094

in HZ-

\Lambda

CDM model. We also consider two extensions of

\Lambda

CDM, including

\Lambda

CDM

+ A_\text{L}

and

\Lambda

CDM

+ \Omega_\text{k}

models. But the extensions of

\Lambda

CDM with a HZ spectrum meet more serious CMB anomalies, i.e. lensing anomaly and spatial curvature anomaly as compared with the extensions of

\Lambda

CDM with a PL spectrum. We discuss that these two CMB anomalies may come from the degeneracy of cosmological parameters.

Note:

22 pages, 9 figures, 3 tables

References(82)

Figures(0)

[1]

C. Donnan
,
D. McLeod
,
J. Dunlop
,
R. McLure
,
A. Carnall

et al.

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 518 (2023) 6011-6040
•
e-Print:
- 2207.12356

[2]

A population of red candidate massive galaxies ~600 Myr after the Big Bang

et al.

- Nature 616 (2023) 7956, 266-269
•
e-Print:
- 2207.12446
•
DOI:
- 10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2

[3]

Stress testing ΛCDM with high-redshift galaxy candidates

Michael Boylan-Kolchin

- Nature Astron. 7 (2023) 6, 731-735,
- Nature Astron. 7 (2023) 731-735
•
e-Print:
- 2208.01611
•
DOI:
- 10.1038/s41550-023-01937-7

[4]

Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

Planck

Collaboration

•

N. Aghanim
(
- Orsay, IAS
)

et al.

- Astron.Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6,
- Astron.Astrophys. 652 (2021) C4 (erratum)
•
e-Print:
- 1807.06209
•
DOI:
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

[4]

Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

Planck

Collaboration

•

N. Aghanim
(
- Orsay, IAS
)

et al.

- Astron.Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6,
- Astron.Astrophys. 652 (2021) C4 (erratum)
•
e-Print:
- 1807.06209
•
DOI:
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

[5]

Reionization after JWST: a photon budget crisis?

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 535 (2024) 1, L37-L43
•
e-Print:
- 2404.07250
•
DOI:
- 10.1093/mnrasl/slae086

[6]

The cosmic timeline implied by the JWST reionization crisis

Fulvio Melia

- Astron.Astrophys. 689 (2024) A10
•
e-Print:
- 2407.01581
•
DOI:
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202450835

[7]

Galaxy Formation and Reionization: Key Unknowns and Expected Breakthroughs by the James Webb Space Telescope

Brant E. Robertson

e-Print:
- 2110.13160
•
DOI:
- 10.1146/annurev-astro-120221-044656

[8]

Reionization inference from the CMB optical depth and E-mode polarization power spectra

et al.

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 499 (2020) 1, 550-558
•
e-Print:
- 2006.16828
•
DOI:
- 10.1093/mnras/staa2797

[9]

Chasing the Beginning of Reionization in the JWST Era

et al.

- Astrophys.J. 980 (2025) 1, 83
•
e-Print:
- 2409.02989
•
DOI:
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ada152

[10]

Stochastic star formation in early galaxies: Implications for the James Webb Space Telescope

- Astron.Astrophys. 677 (2023) L4,
- Astron.Astrophys. 677 (2023) L4
•
e-Print:
- 2307.03219
•
DOI:
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202347384

[11]

Efficient formation of massive galaxies at cosmic dawn by feedback-free starbursts

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 523 (2023) 3, 3201-3218
•
e-Print:
- 2303.04827
•
DOI:
- 10.1093/mnras/stad1557

[12]

A Comprehensive Study of Galaxies at z ∼ 9–16 Found in the Early JWST Data: Ultraviolet Luminosity Functions and Cosmic Star Formation History at the Pre-reionization Epoch

et al.

- Astrophys.J.Suppl. 265 (2023) 1, 5
•
e-Print:
- 2208.01612
•
DOI:
- 10.3847/1538-4365/acaaa9

[13]

On the stunning abundance of super-early, luminous galaxies revealed by JWST

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 522 (2023) 3, 3986-3991
•
e-Print:
- 2208.00720
•
DOI:
- 10.1093/mnras/stad1095

[14]

Compatibility of JWST results with exotic halos

- Phys.Dark Univ. 44 (2024) 101496
•
e-Print:
- 2403.13068
•
DOI:
- 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101496

[15]

Blue monsters. Why are JWST super-early, massive galaxies so blue?

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 520 (2023) 2, 2445-2450
•
e-Print:
- 2209.06840
•
DOI:
- 10.1093/mnras/stad125

[16]

Primordial Bounce-Inflation Scenario to Alleviate Cosmological Tensions and Lensing Anomaly

- Science Bulletin 2025;70(6):829-831
•
e-Print:
- 2409.04027
•
DOI:
- 10.1016/j.scib.2025.01.007

[17]

Measuring the reionization optical depth without large-scale CMB polarization

- Phys.Rev.D 109 (2024) 10, 103519
•
e-Print:
- 2312.06482
•
DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.103519

[18]

Explaining JWST star formation history at $z \sim 17$ by modifying $\Lambda$ CDM

Oleksii Sokoliuk

e-Print:
- 2501.11103

[19]

The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 Maps and Cosmological Parameters

ACT

Collaboration

•

Simone Aiola
(
- CCA, New York and
- Princeton U.
)

et al.

- JCAP 12 (2020) 047
•
e-Print:
- 2007.07288
•
DOI:
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/12/047

[20]

Reionization relics in the cross-correlation between the Lyα forest and 21 cm intensity mapping in the post-reionization era

- Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 536 (2024) 2, 1645-1659,
- MNRAS, 2024, Volume 536, Issue 2, pp. 1645-1659
•
e-Print:
- 2409.11613
•
DOI:
- 10.1093/mnras/stae2684